EU's Covid-19 pass worked well, other tools less so, say auditors
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox
A Covid-19 pass system for the EU worked well to allow continued free movement in the bloc during the pandemic.
PHOTO: REUTERS
BRUSSELS - The European Union’s Covid-19 pass system worked well to allow continued free movement in the bloc during the coronavirus pandemic, but other tools did not fare as well, the European Court of Auditors (ECA) said on Wednesday.
An ECA report focusing on the measures deployed to facilitate travel within the 27-nation bloc at the height of the pandemic found that the European Commission “moved fast” to come up with technology-reliant solutions.
These were important, because the commission – the “guardian” of the EU treaties – was intent on maintaining the bloc’s cherished freedom of movement between member states after some EU countries initially closed their borders to try to contain the spread of the coronavirus.
The chief success, the ECA said, was the EU Covid-19 certificate,
All EU nations used the certificate – and 45 countries outside the EU were also connected to that system – and more than 1.7 billion of the certificates had been issued as at March 2022, the report said.
It was “effective in facilitating travel and improved information sharing and coordination”, said the report by the ECA, which is tasked with evaluating the effectiveness of EU budget spending.
Varied uptake
But other EU technological tools were less effective – sidestepped because some EU countries had their own national measures
These included EU digital passenger locator forms, which the ECA found “were developed too late” and adopted by just four member countries, while an exchange platform for the forms “was hardly used at all”.
Use of contact-tracing applications by EU countries varied considerably, and by May 2022 Germany alone accounted for 83 per cent of the data on the associated gateway.
The ECA report said the commission quickly freed up €71 million (S$101 million) to develop the Covid-19 tech tools. Technical and legislative work was similarly fast, though outpaced in some instances by national measures.
Apart from the Covid-19 certificate, “the other tools... did not have the intended impact because their use was limited”, the report said. It recommended that the commission look into why passenger locator forms were not widely taken up.
It also urged the commission to streamline communication on incidents related to the Covid-19 certificate, and prepare “relevant EU tools for future crises”.
The auditors noted that, before Covid-19, the commission had only limited say over public health matters in EU countries.
The ECA report examined the pandemic period between October 2020 and June 2022.
A separate ECA report released in September 2022 looked at the €71 billion the commission spent on securing up to 4.6 billion Covid-19 vaccine doses for the EU.
The report found that although arrangements were made later than the ones by the United States and Britain, and suffered supply disruptions, they locked in a “diversified portfolio” of jabs.
Largely thanks to the vaccine roll-out, EU countries have effectively downgraded Covid-19 from a pandemic – which implies generalised disruption – to endemic, meaning it is still around but causes less disruption.
The World Health Organisation still regards Covid-19 as a pandemic. On Jan 27, it will hold a meeting to decide whether to continue to regard it as a global health emergency. AFP
