Brazil mediator to address ‘deadlock’ over Eletrobras voting power

Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox

FILE PHOTO: The logo for Eletrobras, a Brazilian electric utilities company, is displayed on a screen on the floor at the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) in New York, U.S., April 9, 2019. REUTERS/Brendan McDermid/FILE PHOTO

Brazil’s government currently owns about 43 per cent of the common shares of Eletrobras, which was privatised in 2022.

Follow topic:

- A judge on Brazil’s Supreme Court formally asked the state mediator on Dec 19 to review a request to grant the government voting power in electric utility Eletrobras proportional to its stake in the formerly state-run company.

The request marks the latest twist in a dispute over how much power the government of President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva should wield over the power company.

Judge Nunes Marques, the top court’s point person on the case, ruled in a written decision published on the court’s website that Eletrobras and the government have 90 days to find a “friendly solution”.

Brazil’s government currently owns about 43 per cent of the common shares of Eletrobras, which was privatised in 2022. But it can only exercise voting power over company decision-making equal to no more than 10 per cent, due to a law regulating privatisations.

The legal rule only applies to shareholders who already owned larger stakes before the privatisation.

In May, the government asked the Supreme Court to grant it voting power proportional to its Eletrobras stake in a legal request from its Solicitor-General’s Office.

At the time, the company warned that if the request was granted, the government would have a much larger say in shareholder votes, which could distort “market investment decisions”.

On Dec 19, the Solicitor-General’s Office committed to make “every effort to find a solution to the deadlock within the deadline”, it said in a statement.

Eletrobras did not immediately respond to a request for comment outside normal business hours. REUTERS

See more on