(NYTIMES) - Novak Djokovic, the world’s No. 1-ranked tennis player, travelled all day on Wednesday (Jan 5) from Dubai to Australia, a journey that was supposed to begin his defence of the Australian Open singles championship.
On Thursday, he was told he would need to leave the country, following a 12-hour stand-off with government officials at a Melbourne Airport, where he was held in a room overnight over questions about the evidence supporting a medical exemption from a coronavirus vaccine.
The exemption was supposed to allow Djokovic, a 20-time Grand Slam champion and one of the biggest stars in sports, to compete in the Australian Open even though he has not been vaccinated.
It was not immediately clear whether Djokovic would appeal the ruling in Australia’s courts. A spokesperson for the tennis star did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
The chain of events represented a startling turnabout for Djokovic, who in a little more than 24 hours went from receiving special, last-minute permission to enter Australia, to boarding an intercontinental flight, to essentially being told by the prime minister of Australia that he was not welcome in the country.
At one point, Serbian President Aleksandar Vucic even got involved, speaking with Djokovic and criticising the Australian government for its treatment of the country’s biggest sports star.
The pandemic has wreaked all manner of havoc with sports during the past two years. The Tokyo Summer Olympics were postponed for a year. Major events took place in empty stadiums. Star players have been sent into isolation just before their competitions after testing positive for the virus.
The situation involving Djokovic, one of the most polarising figures in the sport, was a match for any of them. It turned on a confrontation between a sports superstar and the most powerful leader in one of the world’s most prosperous countries, where government officials, citizens, the media and even some fellow players, criticised the exemption, seemingly prompting the sudden shift.
The decision promises to become another flashpoint in the debate about vaccines and how the pandemic should be managed now, especially in Australia, where egalitarianism is considered a sacred principle – and where “the tennis,” as the Open is called, is also beloved by what often seems like an entire nation of sports fanatics.
In a statement on Thursday, the Australian Border Force pledged to “continue to ensure that those who arrive at our border comply with our laws and entry requirements. The ABF can confirm that Mr Djokovic failed to provide appropriate evidence to meet the entry requirements to Australia, and his visa has been subsequently cancelled.”
For Djokovic, it was the latest and arguably the most wrenching controversy in a career that has been filled with them, nearly all which have been brought on by the behaviour of a champion who can be as willful and unbending off the court as he is on it.
Djokovic has never been shy about expressing his nontraditional views of science and medicine (he once voiced support for the idea that prayer and belief could purify toxic water), and he has stated on multiple occasions his opposition to vaccine mandates, saying vaccination is a private and personal decision that should not be mandated. However, he had not revealed until this week whether he had been vaccinated.
On Tuesday, Djokovic announced on Twitter that he had received a medical exemption from the requirement that all people entering the country be vaccinated or quarantine for 14 days upon arrival. He later boarded a plane bound for Australia from Dubai.
In a statement later that day, Craig Tiley, the chief executive of Tennis Australia, explained that players seeking an exemption had to pass muster with two panels of medical experts. The process included the redaction of personal information to ensure privacy.
“Fair and independent protocols were established for assessing medical exemption applications that will enable us to ensure Australian Open 2022 is safe and enjoyable for everyone,” Tiley said. “Central to this process was that the decisions were made by independent medical experts and that every applicant was given due consideration.”
Djokovic landed at Melbourne’s Tullamarine Airport around 11.30pm on Wednesday. By then, he had become the central figure in a firestorm over how he had received permission to enter Australia, which is experiencing a startling rise in COVID-19 cases.
The country has waged one of the most successful battles against COVID-19, but it has come at a steep price. Strict lockdowns have lasted for months. International borders were largely closed until recently. Inbound travellers had to adhere to an expensive, two-week quarantine upon arrival. For long periods, even domestic travel between states was also prohibited. The country has experienced only 2,200 deaths, but since opening its borders late last year, it is now dealing with more than 30,000 cases a day.
As Djokovic flew to Melbourne, Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison invoked the government’s authority to deny entry to Djokovic.
“Any individual seeking to enter Australia must comply with our border requirements,” Morrison said.
“We await his presentation and what evidence he provides us to support that,” Morrison added. “If that evidence is insufficient, then he won’t be treated any different to anyone else and he’ll be on the next plane home. There should be no special rules for Novak Djokovic at all. None whatsoever.”
Also Wednesday, Jaala Pulford, the acting sports minister for the state of Victoria, which contains Melbourne, where the Open is held, said the state government would not support Djokovic’s application for a visa. Pulford wrote on Twitter that “visa approvals are a matter for the federal government.”
Her statement followed the comments of Australia’s minister for home affairs, Karen Andrews, who had released a statement that noted the government had the authority to block Djokovic from entering the country.
In a statement headlined “Australia’s Border Rules Apply to Everyone,” Andrews said that “while the Victorian Government and Tennis Australia may permit a non-vaccinated player to compete in the Australian Open, it is the Commonwealth Government that will enforce our requirements at the Australian border.”
“No individual competing at the Australian Open will be afforded any special treatment,” Andrews said.
The decision to grant Djokovic a medical exemption from two panels of experts was greeted with scepticism and resignation from some of his fellow players; outrage from Australians.
“I think if it was me that wasn’t vaccinated I wouldn’t be getting an exemption,” Jamie Murray of Britain said on Tuesday.
Others criticised the Australian government for bungling the process and mistreating the world’s top-ranked player.
Tennys Sandgren, the American professional who is also against a vaccination mandate, stated on Twitter that “Australia doesn’t deserve to host a Grand Slam.”
Djokovic, who is tied with Rafael Nadal and Roger Federer for the most Grand Slam men’s singles titles with 20, would have been a favorite to win his 21st in Melbourne, where he has prevailed nine times.
Melbourne has a small but energetic community of Serbian expatriates, who attend all of Djokovic’s matches at Rod Laver Arena, and provide him with rare enthusiastic support away from his homeland, despite his stature as arguably the greatest player of all time.