Why a football-crazy continent gets just 3 World Cup games for 2030 South American centenary
Sign up now: Get the biggest sports news in your inbox
(From left) Paraguay's football association president Robert Harrison, Uruguay's football association president Ignacio Alonso, Conmebol president Alejandro Dominguez, and Conmebol vice-president Claudio Tapia, with the World Cup trophy.
PHOTO: REUTERS
Follow topic:
NEW YORK – For a region that lives and breathes football like South America, Fifa’s 2030 World Cup announcement could only be seen as a disappointment.
Only three games will be played in Argentina, Uruguay and Paraguay after the nations pitched to host the 2030 event together as a commemoration to the 100th anniversary of the World Cup, which first took place in Montevideo.
Governing body Fifa confirmed on Wednesday that Morocco, Portugal and Spain will jointly host
While the decision was heralded as a novel way of hosting the World Cup on three continents – Africa, Europe and South America – and six countries, the South American countries’ failure to win a full tournament reflected their political volatility and infrastructure shortages.
In sports, where money talks, it is hard for the region to compete.
Argentina may be the reigning world champions and have arguably the best player in history in Lionel Messi, but its economy is in tatters, with inflation above 120 per cent and no access to international credit markets.
That is a key drawback because World Cup tournaments typically require billions of dollars in infrastructure and logistics spending – as seen in the 2022 Qatar tournament – and deep political commitment.
“It was impossible to get the votes, it was impossible to get the investment to do a World Cup of this scale,” said Argentina football chief Claudio Tapia, who argued that getting the opening games was still a triumph for the region.
Yet Fifa was still criticised for its selection of Qatar as the host of the 2022 World Cup in prioritising financial gain over the fan experience, and international visitors fell short of projections, at least in the early rounds. In Buenos Aires, meanwhile, more than five million people took to the streets to celebrate Argentina’s victory.
Objectively, Fifa has probably made the right call for 2030, although not everybody will look at South America’s weak financial power as a stumbling block.
“People LOVE attending matches in these countries. Want an immaculate stadium with great logistics? Fine, go to Qatar,” Brian Winter, editor-in-chief of Americas Quarterly, wrote in a post on X.
“Congrats Fifa for screwing up yet again.”
Brazil’s problems in organising the 2014 World Cup may also have played a role in Fifa’s decision.
At the time, Brazil decided to build or refurbish 12 different venues at a huge fiscal cost, with the projects subsequently being the focus of several corruption investigations and scandal.
In an iconic case of the mismanagement, a landmark stadium in Brasilia ended up costing about US$800 million (S$1.1 billion).
With the capital city lacking a professional football team of its own, the stadium ended up being a “white elephant” that was used for everything from country and western music concerts to weddings and a temporary health centre during the Covid-19 pandemic. BLOOMBERG
