Singapore monitoring impact of Meta’s move to end fact-checking programme
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox
Singapore will continue its existing approach to addressing misinformation, said Ms Rahayu Mahzam, pointing to the various regulations the Republic has.
PHOTO: REUTERS
Follow topic:
SINGAPORE – Singapore is monitoring developments arising from Meta’s move to stop using third-party fact-checkers on Facebook, Threads and Instagram and instead rely on users to add notes to posts, even though the move appears to be limited to the US in the near term.
“Meta has been assessed to be a social media platform with significant reach in Singapore.
“The Government is naturally concerned about the impact of its policies and practices on Singapore,” said Minister of State for Digital Development and Information Rahayu Mahzam in Parliament on Feb 5.
Singapore is assessing the impact locally, especially if such changes are also implemented in the Republic, she added.
Ms Rahayu was responding to a parliamentary question by Mr Alex Yam (Marsiling-Yew Tee GRC) about the implications for Singapore’s digital ecosystem, the safety of online discourse and the spread of misinformation and harmful content on Meta’s platforms.
Meta’s move, announced in January,
This shift has come as content moderation efforts by social media companies have been criticised as censorship and as tech firms throw their weight behind unfettered speech online to cosy up to US President Donald Trump.
Ms Rahayu pointed out that a reliable fact-checking and content moderation system on social media platforms serves as a crucial first line of defence against misinformation and harmful online content.
This allows platforms to act early to detect, correct or filter out such material.
Singapore will continue its existing approach to addressing misinformation, said Ms Rahayu, pointing to the various regulations the Republic has.
For example, the Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act (Pofma) enables the Government to issue corrections against online falsehoods that are against the public interest.
The codes of practice under Pofma also require social media platforms like Meta, X and Google to put in place safeguards to promote credible online sources of information, enhance transparency in political advertising, and prevent and counter the abuse of online accounts.
Mr Yam also pressed the Government on whether it will be prepared for the “great scope of damage” if various social media companies shift their content moderation policies to be like those of X and Meta, or if such policies become broad-based and company-wide across various jurisdictions.
Several risk areas apply to Singapore, like social cohesion and the upcoming elections, said Mr Yam.
Ms Rahayu said Singapore takes a collaborative approach with social media platforms and is in active engagement with Meta to understand the specifics and details of its new policy, and its implications for Singapore.
“We will continue to assess if there are areas of concern or if there are areas where we need to enhance our regulation to see if they will continue to meet their obligations under our existing regulations,” said Ms Rahayu.
The Government is also on the lookout for developments during sensitive times like elections, which is why a Bill to ban deepfakes during the period, the Elections (Integrity of Online Advertising) Bill, was recently passed, added Ms Rahayu.
Lee Li Ying is a correspondent on the health beat at The Straits Times. She has a keen interest in mental health, health technology, ageing and reproductive care.
