Legal experts have weighed in on former Chief Justice Chan Sek Keong's analysis of a gay-sex law, saying his arguments suggest there are two options open to a court of law: Either declare the clause unconstitutional or read it in a way that conforms to the constitutional requirement.
While the former lies with Parliament, it is unclear if Mr Chan is pushing for the latter.
Already a subscriber? Log in
Read the full story and more at $9.90/month
Get exclusive reports and insights with more than 500 subscriber-only articles every month
ST One Digital
$9.90/month
No contract
ST app access on 1 mobile device
Unlock these benefits
All subscriber-only content on ST app and straitstimes.com
Easy access any time via ST app on 1 mobile device
E-paper with 2-week archive so you won't miss out on content that matters to you
