Those who have been fully vaccinated, and that is two-thirds of the population currently, will be able to gather in groups of up to five people for activities such as dining in and masks-off sports from next Tuesday (Aug 10).
To join them, unless they are children below the age of 12, people who have not been vaccinated, or been previously infected, will need a valid pre-event test result.
People who have been vaccinated will also be able to resume activities and services that require the removal of masks, such as facials and saunas. But the unvaccinated cannot.
And from October, unvaccinated people working in sectors where there is a risk that they could transmit the disease to customers will need to carry out twice-weekly tests to prove they are not infected.
There are three groups of people not vaccinated:
1. Children under the age of 12, for whom there is currently no Covid-19 vaccine. Some exemptions have been made for them, such as eating out with their families.
2. People who are unable to get vaccinated for medical reasons. The number in this group is very small. They need to take extra care not to get infected since their medical conditions could lead to more serious illness.
3. People who are able to but for personal reasons refuse to be vaccinated. This is the group that is the target of the differentiated treatment.
Is the Government being fair to them? After all, Covid-19 vaccination is not compulsory, unlike vaccination against diphtheria and measles.
So, should it not be up to the individual whether to get vaccinated or to risk getting the disease? Why stop them from taking part in activities that others can?
The multi-ministry task force tackling the pandemic said: "Unvaccinated individuals will need to exercise tighter safe management measures to protect themselves and those around them."
So yes, they are being discriminated against, even as the choice of being vaccinated remains with them.
More on this topic
But instead of asking if this is fair to them, we should ask: Are these people being fair to the rest of the nation?
Several people in Singapore who were fully vaccinated have fallen seriously ill. They all have medical conditions that likely made them more susceptible to catching the virus and developing serious symptoms.
These individuals, as well as people who cannot be vaccinated for medical reasons, remain at high risk. They need to be protected, since it is through no fault of theirs that they are put at risk.
So asking those who refuse to get vaccinated to get tested - to prove they are free from the disease before being allowed to participate - is actually being fair to all.
It is a practice other countries, such as Italy and Pakistan, are also implementing.
People who refuse to vaccinate put themselves at risk. But so long as vaccination is not compulsory, it is their choice to make.
But we should not allow that freedom or choice to put others at risk.
In fact, Singapore should go one step further and not provide subsidised treatment, or insurance coverage, for people who can but refuse to get vaccinated, should they become infected with Covid-19.
After all, their refusal to vaccinate is tantamount to a self-inflicted injury.
We have been experiencing some problems with subscriber log-ins and apologise for the inconvenience caused. Until we resolve the issues, subscribers need not log in to access ST Digital articles. But a log-in is still required for our PDFs.