AT THE COURTS

Two Malaysians claim trial over alleged roles in fraudulent trading scheme

Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox

Google Preferred Source badge
Investors were told that professional traders would be conducting forex trades on their behalf, with returns as high as 13 per cent a month.
That pitch by Singapore-incorporated company Singliworld drew the interest of "thousands" from March 2014 to May 2015, a district court heard yesterday.
But by May 2015, more than 2,000 investors had been defrauded and the firm's liabilities exceeded US$17 million (S$23 million), said Deputy Public Prosecutor Nicholas Tan.
Two Malaysian men are now claiming trial over their alleged roles in the scheme.
One of them is Singliworld's managing director, Leong Koon Wah. The 53-year-old Singapore permanent resident faces five charges including those under the Securities and Futures Act.
Ng Kuan Chuan, 35, who was a director and shareholder of another firm called Singliworld HK, faces two charges under the Securities and Futures Act and one under the Companies Act.
DPP Tan said investors in the purported investment scheme called "Singliforex" were promised that a team of professional traders would use their monies to trade in "currency pairs" on the world's forex markets.
"The scheme purported to generate trading returns as high as 13 per cent per month, while slyly also purporting to generate conservative returns as low as 2 per cent in some months - thereby appearing both attractive and realistic at the same time," he added.
He told the court that the "sophisticated scheme depended on the complicity of two foreign-incorporated firms, which purported to play the role of forex trading brokerages". They are Hong Kong-incorporated Triumph Global (Asia) and New Zealand-incorporated Union Markets.
The court heard that investors were told that professional traders were conducting the forex trades through these brokerages.
"In reality, there were no such genuine traders, no such genuine trading, and no such genuine trading returns," said DPP Tan.
He said the Singliforex scheme was not viable as there was no sustainable means to pay investors all of the monies that they were entitled to under the scheme.
He added that Singliforex was also an illegal multi-level marketing scheme. "The scheme comprised a 'rebate' structure that offered investors payouts for the (supposed) trading activities of their downlines. Investors were thus incentivised to recruit others to invest in the Singliforex scheme."
The trial continues.
See more on