Cancer patient's negligence claims against hospital and doctors dismissed

Ms Noor Azlin Abdul Rahman had sought damages from CGH and three doctors for their alleged failure to diagnose and treat a nodule in her right lung earlier. The judge said her negligence claims failed because a causation was "simply not made out". PHOTO: NOOR AZLIN ABDUL RAHMAN

SINGAPORE - The High Court has dismissed negligence claims against a hospital and three doctors by a patient who alleged that if a nodule in her lung had been detected as cancerous five years earlier, it would have made a difference.

After a 28-day trial, Justice Belinda Ang found that the nodule in the right lung of Ms Noor Azlin Abdul Rahman was benign when it was first detected in 2007 by the doctors at Changi General Hospital (CGH), and remained so through to 2011.

"The plaintiff does not have any definitive medical evidence showing that she had cancer from 2007 to 2011," said the judge in decision grounds earlier this month.

Justice Ang found the defendants were able to show - based on expert testimony and supported by radiological and other evidence - that the nodule " was initially benign".

It turned malignant some time after July 2011 and before early February 2012, she said.

Lung cancer was detected following a biopsy on Feb 16, 2012, on Ms Azlin, 38.

"The medical evidence shows that (she) was diagnosed at the earliest possible stage of her cancer and received the full treatment available to her," wrote Justice Ang.

She noted that Ms Azlin "did not lose out on any opportunity to take advantage of any available treatments and did not undergo any treatment that could have been avoided".

Ms Azlin, through lawyer V. K. Rai, had sought damages from CGH and the three doctors for their alleged failure to diagnose and treat the nodule during her consultations for five years, before the cancer was diagnosed in 2012.

The doctors are respiratory specialist Imran Mohamed Noor, and two medical officers who attended to her at the accident and emergency department, Dr Yap Hsiang and Dr Jason Soh.

The hospital, defended by lawyer and now Senior Counsel Kuah Boon Theng, and the three doctors, represented by lawyer Lek Siang Pheng, disputed the claims.

The trial, which took place in several tranches last year, saw several experts testifying on both sides.

Justice Ang, in a 68-page judgment, said Ms Azlin's negligence claims failed because a causation was "simply not made out".

She noted that Ms Azlin's lung cancer was a very specific type of cancer known as an ALK-positive cancer. It occurs due to a rare gene fusion process which can transform benign cells into malignant cells.

Based on the expert evidence, the nodule which had been stable and dormant during the time when the defendants examined her, only became more aggressive subsequently.

Although the judge held that CGH and Dr Imran, whom Ms Azlin was referred to in November 2007, had breached their duty of care in one aspect, this did not cause her cancer nor support her claim of compensation.

Justice Ang found CGH had failed to inform Ms Azlin of the results of the April 2010 and July 2011 X-rays. She suggested the hospital have a patient notification system "as part of the safety net" to inform a patient of X-ray report results "even if it had decided that there was no need for further follow-up".

CGH declined to comment when contacted by The Straits Times.

Ms Azlin, who is undergoing daily radiation treatment for stage four cancer, intends to file an appeal.

She told The Straits Times she was grateful for being employed as a part-time supervisor.

" I'm a gladiator," she added, having made up to look good for a photograph.

Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.