Women paying more for CareShield Life

Equal coverage but unequal premiums: Is it fair to charge women more for CareShield Life?

The reasons for higher CareShield Life premiums for women involve economics and logic, but some say a gender-based approach is unfair. Insight looks at the issue and how such perceptions could be addressed.

A local study has found that the average 60-year-old man has 22 more years ahead of him, with three of those years disabled in some way. In contrast, a woman of the same age will live 26 more years, eight of them with disability. PHOTOS: ST FILE
New: Gift this subscriber-only story to your friends and family

No one objected 16 years ago when the opt-out disability scheme, ElderShield, was launched with higher premiums for women, due to their higher risk of disability.

But during a Parliament session earlier this month, a debate emerged over the extra sum of about $50 in annual premiums that women will pay compared to men under the proposed CareShield Life scheme - which builds on ElderShield and will become compulsory - when they join at age 30.

Already a subscriber? 

Read the full story and more at $9.90/month

Get exclusive reports and insights with more than 500 subscriber-only articles every month

Unlock these benefits

  • All subscriber-only content on ST app and straitstimes.com

  • Easy access any time via ST app on 1 mobile device

  • E-paper with 2-week archive so you won't miss out on content that matters to you

Join ST's WhatsApp Channel and get the latest news and must-reads.

A version of this article appeared in the print edition of The Sunday Times on July 22, 2018, with the headline Equal coverage but unequal premiums: Is it fair to charge women more for CareShield Life?. Subscribe