For subscribers

Why we must revisit the thorny issue of designing perfect babies

Chinese scientist He Jiankui’s punishment for creating genetically modified babies did not end the ethical or scientific debate. The ‘pronatalist’ movement raises again the question of eugenics.

Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox

Since James Watson and Francis Crick first described the structure of DNA , scientists have debated creating genetically modified babies.

Since James Watson and Francis Crick first described the structure of DNA , scientists have debated creating genetically modified babies.

PHOTO: UNSPLASH

Eben Kirksey

Follow topic:

Since James Watson and Francis Crick first described the structure of the DNA double helix, scientists have debated the potential for creating genetically modified babies. In 2018, a Chinese scientist named He Jiankui

announced he had actually done it:

He used a gene editing tool called Crispr to edit the embryos of twin girls in hopes of making them resistant to HIV (human immunodeficiency virus).

China’s laws governing reproductive medicine and gene editing were ill-defined at the time. But outrage among scientists and the public

led to Dr He being sentenced to prison for three years

on charges of “illegal medical practice”, under a broad statute, and denounced as pursuing “personal fame and profit”.

See more on