For subscribers

What abundance can’t achieve

Growth is worthwhile in itself – but it’s not a cure for populism.

Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox

Perhaps the test of abundance isn’t just private consumption but the fundamentals of infrastructure.

Perhaps the test of abundance isn’t just private consumption but the fundamentals of infrastructure.

PHOTO: ST FILE

Janan Ganesh

Google Preferred Source badge

Marina Bay in Singapore was a less desirable address half a century ago. I don’t mean that it had fewer residential towers with drone-like views of the Grand Prix circuit. I mean the land itself was water: yet to be hard-won from the Strait. Like the growth of Changi, the carpeted and plant-filled resort that it pleases some to call an airport, this reclamation scheme has helped the island accommodate six million, up from 2.5 million when I was there as an infant.

There are other “bay areas”, of course. In the book of the hour, Abundance, authors Ezra Klein and Derek Thompson often cite San Francisco, California, as what happens when red tape, bureaucratic inertia, judicial review and raw Nimbyism (not in my backyard) smother growth projects. That is, depopulation and homelessness: almost a paradox of failure.

See more on