For subscribers

The wrong way to teach: A teacher overseeing 300 AI-tutored students

Teachers ‘somewhere in the system’ is not the same as putting them in charge of learning.

Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox

Teachers are not there merely to check AI outputs. They exercise judgment on when to introduce AI, when to withhold it, and when to deliberately slow things down so students wrestle with complexity rather than outsource it.

Teachers are not there merely to check AI outputs. They exercise judgment on when to introduce AI, when to withhold it, and when to deliberately slow things down so students wrestle with complexity rather than outsource it.

ST PHOTO: RYAN CHIONG

Audrey Cheong

Google Preferred Source badge

In the last few years,

as artificial intelligence entered classrooms and staffrooms,

one phrase has become the default reassurance: “Keep the human in the loop.”

It sounds responsible. It suggests that as long as a teacher is somewhere in the system, learners are safe and learning is preserved. But this framing repositions humans in a supervisory role around machines, rather than in a leadership role over the entire learning endeavour.

See more on