For subscribers

The mathematics used in economics for decades may be the wrong kind

The underlying logic needs a rethink.

Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox

Containers are seen at the Port of Nanjing in eastern China's Jiangsu province. China's exports expanded 4.4 percent year-on-year in August, official data showed on September 8, as the world's second-largest economy navigated an uneasy trade war truce with the United States. (Photo by AFP) / China OUT

Maybe the problem economics faces isn’t that it is too mathematical, but that the mathematics it has used for decades is needlessly narrow, says the writer.

PHOTO: AFP

Tim Harford

Google Preferred Source badge

The first term of my master’s degree in economics was an alarming experience. The econometrics was bewildering. The macroeconomics was even more mysterious.

Everything was drenched in incomprehensible mathematics – or, to be more honest, maths that I could not comprehend. Most worrying of all was the microeconomics: This was a subject that had felt so natural and so enjoyable as an undergraduate, but now, it, too, had retreated into an austere stronghold of calculus.

See more on