For subscribers

The mathematics used in economics for decades may be the wrong kind

The underlying logic needs a rethink.

Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox

Containers are seen at the Port of Nanjing in eastern China's Jiangsu province. China's exports expanded 4.4 percent year-on-year in August, official data showed on September 8, as the world's second-largest economy navigated an uneasy trade war truce with the United States. (Photo by AFP) / China OUT

Maybe the problem economics faces isn’t that it is too mathematical, but that the mathematics it has used for decades is needlessly narrow, says the writer.

PHOTO: AFP

Tim Harford

Follow topic:

The first term of my master’s degree in economics was an alarming experience. The econometrics was bewildering. The macroeconomics was even more mysterious.

Everything was drenched in incomprehensible mathematics – or, to be more honest, maths that I could not comprehend. Most worrying of all was the microeconomics: This was a subject that had felt so natural and so enjoyable as an undergraduate, but now, it, too, had retreated into an austere stronghold of calculus.

See more on