The Straits Times says

Debt collection in need of cleaning up

New: Gift this subscriber-only story to your friends and family

That a police licence may be needed to run a debt collection agency in Singapore is one of several rules under proposed laws to regulate the activities of such agencies and dissociate them from the strong-arm tactics often employed by loan sharks who operate illegally. Debt collection is a legitimate activity: delinquent debt can hurt a company's bottom line, particularly in the case of a small business. Debtors must not be allowed to behave with impunity but must be held to the fulfilment of their financial obligations. However, the way debt collection is carried out is extremely important. When it approaches harassment, it clearly needs to be stopped.

Indeed, there have been a high number of police reports made against debt collection companies and their staff for causing alarm and nuisance to members of the public. There were 134 such reports in 2015. This grew to 590 in 2018, before falling to 272 reports last year. The problem is that there are no regulations that deal specifically with what debt collectors can or cannot do. This loophole allows unscrupulous agencies to act in ways that are intimidating, including through speech, writings, signs or any visible representation. Their actions tarnish the reputation of the industry at large and create an association, in some minds, between the work of legitimate debt collectors and the tactics employed by illegal loan sharks to recover what they are owed.

Already a subscriber? 

Read the full story and more at $9.90/month

Get exclusive reports and insights with more than 500 subscriber-only articles every month

Unlock these benefits

  • All subscriber-only content on ST app and

  • Easy access any time via ST app on 1 mobile device

  • E-paper with 2-week archive so you won't miss out on content that matters to you

Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.