For subscribers

Meta and X subscriptions offer users little play for pay 

One’s a political stunt and the other’s a cry for help, and both provide scant appeal for consumers.

Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox

Consumers are willing to pay, but only when there is something actually in it for them. Meta and X users will struggle to figure out what that is.

Consumers are willing to pay, but only when there is something actually in it for them. Meta and X users will struggle to figure out what that is.

PHOTOS: AFP

Dave Lee

Google Preferred Source badge

What would you pay to stop a social network from bombarding you with targeted ads? In the last few days, users have received a couple of different proposals – neither of which is likely to appeal to most of them.

Meta Platforms thinks it is €9.99 (S$14.50) a month. Except it does not truly think that. Its subscription plan, announced on Monday, removes targeted advertising from Facebook and Instagram for users in the European Union, Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway and Switzerland. As far as Meta’s concerned, it will be a roaring success if it is a total flop. Its purpose is to provide the necessary proof that users do not want it and are perfectly willing to receive targeted advertising if it means continuing to use Meta’s services for free.

See more on