Forum: Mural should reflect Singapore’s maritime heritage more accurately

I am concerned about a longstanding public display in the pedestrian underpass next to Parliament House.

A large mural features the date 1819, with the tagline “Sir Raffles, Stamford – The beginning of Singapore’s trading”.

While acknowledging Sir Stamford Raffles’ pivotal role in modern Singapore’s development, this statement presents an incomplete and misleading narrative of our history, perhaps especially for tourists who use the popular walkway.

The mural oversimplifies Singapore’s rich trading heritage. Historical records, including Chinese accounts, indicate that Singapore, known as Temasek, was a thriving trading port centuries before Raffles’ arrival.

Fortunately, it is encouraging to note the efforts made by the Maritime and Port Authority of Singapore (MPA) to curate a maritime heritage zone at the Singapore Maritime Gallery (

Revamped gallery showcases Singapore’s long maritime history through new interactive exhibits,

March 17).

Its commendable presentation of complex maritime history in layman’s language showcases how Singapore’s role in regional trade is documented in ancient Chinese texts, and also highlights underwater archaeological finds which include those from the Song Dynasty that illustrate Singapore’s rich maritime past.

While 1819 marked a significant turning point, it was not the genesis of Singapore’s trading history. Public displays and educational materials should reflect a more comprehensive understanding of our past, ensuring that we honour the contributions of all who shaped Singapore’s development. 

As co-founder of the Singapore Maritime Heritage Interest Group, I hope the authorities can review and revise this mural to reflect a more accurate portrayal of Singapore’s trading heritage, aligning it with MPA’s commendable efforts in showcasing our nation’s rich maritime past, especially as we celebrate SG60 this year. 

Kuet Ee Yoon