Forum: Move beyond formulaic HDB housing plans and embrace fresh design approaches

I read with great interest Christine Sun’s comprehensive review of the achievements of HDB housing projects, and her insightful comparison of valuation and appreciation trends over the past decade. (

Closer to city centre better? Singapore’s idea of prime public housing is changing

, Aug 25)

While HDB has done commendable work, it is evident that most standard units and block layouts share strong similarities, with only modest variations such as in Punggol, Duxton and The Pinnacle. The upcoming new towns in Sembawang and Kranji present a unique opportunity to depart from the conventional model, and to conceive a resort-style waterfront town – maintaining density and amenities but with a distinctive ambience and character.

This is not a new idea. As early as 1992, the Singapore Institute of Architects showcased forward-looking concepts in its Development Guide Plan exhibition for Changi, Loyang, Jurong and Bugis. At that time, the proposals may have seemed too futuristic. Yet today, after decades of building largely repetitive towns, the time is ripe to reimagine our approach.

I would like to suggest exploring a model of predominantly low-rise housing – up to six storeys – complemented by landmark towers at key locations for private development. Such diversity would better reflect the maturing needs of our population. Families with young children often prefer direct access to the ground for outdoor play and neighbourly interaction, while the elderly value the convenience of a garden patch or ground-floor living, much like the charming flats of Tiong Bahru which remain highly sought-after.

Singapore now has the chance to move beyond formulaic housing plans and embrace fresh, unconventional design approaches for its future new towns. This would provide residents with genuine lifestyle choices for different stages of life, while reinforcing the character and vibrancy of our built environment.

Wee Chwee Heng