Forum: Is it necessary to replace fully functional HDB fixtures?

As a resident of a Housing Board block in Toa Payoh, I would like to raise a concern with the current implementation of Repair and Redecoration (R&R) cyclical works.

Seven years after our blocks were completed, they got a fresh coat of paint. This was within the expected R&R timeframe. However, I was surprised to see that the floor directory boards on every level were also removed and replaced, despite being fully functional and not damaged in any way. The tiles at the lift lobbies and void decks are also being completely removed and replaced, despite being neither cracked nor defective.

Upon writing to the Bishan-Toa Payoh Town Council, I was informed that these works fall under standard R&R cycles. I was also directed to the published tender, which indicates a cost of approximately $3 million for 15 blocks in Toa Payoh.

I understand the importance of estate upkeep. But I wonder if such replacements – particularly for items that remain functional and in good condition – are necessary.

From a resident’s perspective, what we’re concerned about is safety, functionality and cleanliness. Replacing serviceable fixtures and finishes does not appear to significantly improve our living experience.

Given the scale of such projects across estates in Singapore, the cumulative cost is likely substantial. If more targeted, condition-based maintenance were adopted instead of routine replacement, the potential savings could be considerable. These resources could then be redirected towards areas of greater need, such as essential repairs, community facilities, or support for residents.

I hope that policymakers can review the current approach to cyclical R&R works and consider a more needs-based model that prioritises function, sustainability and cost-effectiveness.

Jackie Li