Forum: As Singapore Cruise Centre grows, consider impact of vessel emissions and noise
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox
The article “Singapore Cruise Centre sees over 720,000 travellers since opening” (Sept 22) highlights the encouraging growth in passenger traffic through the new Singapore Cruise Centre (SCC). But it is also timely to consider the impact of vessel emissions and noise on the surrounding community.
As a resident living nearby, I have experienced occasions when diesel fumes from vessels were sufficiently strong to cause discomfort. Vessel noise can also be disturbing, particularly during early-morning or late-night operations.
These issues could become more significant as vessel traffic increases.
The SCC is surrounded not only by dense residential estates but also by popular leisure and tourism destinations, including Sentosa and the waterfront at HarbourFront. Addressing the problem early would benefit both residents and visitors.
Singapore already regulates unnecessary engine idling by land vehicles because of its contribution to pollution. Vessels have different operational and safety requirements, but could a similar principle be considered for passenger vessels?
Where operationally and safely feasible, vessels should avoid keeping engines running unnecessarily while stationary alongside the terminal. Operators could be encouraged to progressively adopt electric vessels and cleaner propulsion technologies.
The growth of the SCC is positive for Singapore’s tourism and maritime sectors, but it should go hand in hand with environmental responsibility. Taking action now to reduce avoidable diesel emissions and noise would help ensure that a thriving cruise and ferry hub can co-exist with a clean and liveable environment.
Yong Siong Hock