For subscribers
Anime lessons in the limits of AI
Generative images show us the risks of endowing the technology with magical powers.
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox
Studio Ghibli's The Boy and the Heron. We need to remember to treat AI not as a magical force capable of providing us with certain answer.
PHOTO: STUDIO GHIBLI
Stephen Bush
Follow topic:
Another leap forward for ChatGPT’s capabilities is, inevitably, accompanied by a wave of people using these capacities to produce knock-offs of work by great artists. The latest artist to have been the topic of media commentary and much of OpenAI’s own promotion – its chief executive Sam Altman has even changed his X avatar accordingly – is Hayao Miyazaki, co-founder of Studio Ghibli. Social media is awash with images purporting to be in the same style as Miyazaki’s work
I use the word “purporting” quite deliberately because most of what is produced “looks like” the output of Studio Ghibli in the same sense that I “look like” Will Smith. The colour and the shape (to a rough approximation) are about right. But take another look with anything resembling care and attention, and what it is clear is that the two look nothing alike. Characters do not make eye contact with one another. Patterns of light and shade, or detailed depictions of the imperfections in wood or stone, are largely absent.
