Late US author Cormac McCarthy had relationship with 16-year-old girl when he was 42, according to Vanity Fair
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox
The late American writer Cormac McCarthy was notoriously guarded during his lifetime and a code of silence extended to those in his inner circle.
PHOTO: AFP
Follow topic:
NEW YORK – On Nov 20, American magazine Vanity Fair published a bombshell article revealing that Cormac McCarthy, one of the United States’ most celebrated and enigmatic novelists, had a relationship with a girl he met when he was 42 and she was 16.
She was a foster child who felt so unsafe at home, she often carried a gun and used the pool area at the motel where he was staying to shower.
The revelations in the article stunned many fans of the famously inscrutable author, but did not come as a surprise to McCarthy’s close friends or the tight-knit community of scholars who have studied his life and work.
McCarthy’s relationship with Ms Augusta Britt lasted nearly until he died at age 89 in June 2023, and came up in his letters over the years.
What left many scholars surprised, and unconvinced, was the notion asserted in Vanity Fair that Ms Britt was the key inspiration for some of McCarthy’s most memorable characters – and that she profoundly shaped other aspects of his work, including recurring themes and motifs, even his obsession with horses, firearms and the vulnerable young women who suffer violence and heartbreak in his books.
Dr Dianne Luce, who has written several books about McCarthy, said she and another McCarthy scholar, the late Dr Edwin Arnold, learnt about his relationship with Ms Britt around 40 years ago, during an interview with a friend of McCarthy’s.
Over the years, she saw the relationship come up in the author’s letters to his literary friends, among them Robert Coles, Guy Davenport and Mark Morrow.
Their connection was long-lasting, but Dr Luce said she believes that many of the Vanity Fair article’s claims about Ms Britt’s singular influence on McCarthy’s work were overblown.
The story’s author, Mr Vincenzo Barney, depicts Ms Britt as a model for characters in 10 of his books, including Wanda and Harrogate in Suttree (1979), Alejandra in All The Pretty Horses (1992), Carla Jean in No Country For Old Men (2005), and Alicia Western in The Passenger (2022) and Stella Maris (2022), among other characters.
“I’m deeply sceptical of most of these assertions about how she shows up in his work,” Dr Luce said.
In particular, she questioned the claim that McCarthy had based the characters of Wanda and Harrogate in Suttree on Ms Britt, because he wrote a draft of the novel with those characters years before meeting her.
Several other McCarthy experts, including his authorised biographer Laurence Gonzales, and three other scholars who have closely studied his work and life, shared that scepticism.
Dr Bryan Giemza, a professor at Texas Tech University who has written about McCarthy’s fascination with science, said he found some of the claims about Ms Britt’s influence on the novelist to be exaggerated, including the notion that she was the primary model for Alicia Western.
“From my standpoint, there are some real stretchers in there,” Dr Giemza said of the article’s claims. “It doesn’t really sound true to the way that an artist’s imagination works. More than likely, a major character is a pastiche of people.”
Vanity Fair declined to discuss its editorial and fact-checking procedures with The New York Times (NYT). But Mr Daniel Kile, the magazine’s deputy editor, downplayed criticism from scholars who said that the article overstates Ms Britt’s influence on McCarthy’s work.
“It’s subjective,” Mr Kile said. “Augusta Britt is our focus, and we are reporting that Augusta believes she inspired these characters. Other sources close to McCarthy, including scholars we spoke with, believe that she influenced these characters. And in many instances, McCarthy’s letters, which we’ve read, corroborate that she inspired many of the characters.”
Ms Britt, who in her comments to Vanity Fair described her romantic relationship with McCarthy as consensual, did not respond to a request for comment from NYT. Mr Barney was not able to offer a timely comment. Knopf, McCarthy’s publisher, declined to comment.
Several scholars also raised questions about the extensive excerpts from McCarthy’s letters to Ms Britt, and noted that while she owns the physical letters, McCarthy’s words, even in letters to others, are the intellectual property of his literary estate.
Attempts to reach a representative of McCarthy’s literary estate were not successful, but a person with knowledge of the estate’s practices who was not authorised to speak on the record said the estate did not grant permission for McCarthy’s letters to be reproduced.
During his lifetime, McCarthy was notoriously guarded, and a code of silence extended to those in his inner circle.
Ms Britt’s detailed account of their relationship in Vanity Fair offers a rare window into McCarthy’s private thoughts and into an inner life that has long been shielded from the public.
Mr Gonzales, McCarthy’s biographer and long-time friend, attempted to interview Ms Britt for his forthcoming biography, he said, but she did not respond.
While scholars and readers are debating the merits and significance of the claims in the Vanity Fair article, there is no question that it marks a major shift in McCarthy’s public profile.
In the Vanity Fair article, Ms Britt described how the two began a sexual relationship when she was still a minor, but she said she was in love with him and found in him the sense of safety that was lacking in her life. She also said McCarthy doctored her birth certificate to smuggle her into Mexico.
Ms Britt shared with Vanity Fair a trove of letters from McCarthy, including romantic overtures written when she was a teenager, before they absconded across the border. A few years later, she ended their sexual relationship, she said, but the pair continued to exchange letters, talk on the phone and visit each other for decades.
She told the magazine she was unaware that McCarthy was still married to his second wife, Ms Annie DeLisle, when the two were living together in El Paso, Texas, in 1977. A year later, on a trip to Las Vegas, she learnt that McCarthy had a son her age from his first marriage to Ms Lee Holleman.
She said what really left her feeling betrayed, though, was his tendency to repurpose her life in his fiction, and to kill off characters she believed to be based on her.
When Ms Britt’s story was published last week, there was a flurry of correspondence among McCarthy scholars, who debated the article’s claims and discussed whether the revelations might prompt a backlash, discouraging readers from picking up his books, or leading literature professors to stop assigning his novels.
Dr Tracy Daugherty, an acclaimed literary biographer who is working on a book about McCarthy, said it would take time for researchers and scholars to verify Ms Britt’s claims, determine the extent of her impact on his work and see whether his literary reputation suffers.
“It’s far too early to assess what the long-term effect of this story will be on McCarthy’s literary legacy,” said Dr Daugherty, who has written biographies of late American authors Larry McMurtry, Joan Didion, Joseph Heller and Donald Barthelme. NYTIMES

