Christie’s first AI art auction sees hits... and plenty of misses
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox
Follow topic:
NEW YORK – Christie’s first auction of art made by artificial intelligence (AI) ended on March 5 with mixed results, providing scant clues as to the future of the new and controversial medium.
Fourteen of the 34 lots put on the block during the 14-day online auction either received no qualifying bids or were sold for less than the minimum Christie’s had estimated.
One did go for more than expected. An animation by well-known digital artist Refik Anadol titled Machine Hallucinations – ISS Dreams – A fetched the highest price at US$277,200 (S$369,000).
But an Emerging Faces creation by American artist Pindar Van Arman, touted as another highlight of the auction, saw no qualifying bids.
A work by the late American artist Charles Csuri, considered a pioneer of “computer art”, went for US$50,400 – slightly below the bottom of a price range announced by the auction house.
American artist Charles Csuri’s Bspline Men went for US$50,400, slightly below the bottom of a price range announced by Christie’s.
PHOTO: EPA-EFE
Auction sales tallied US$728,784 in total, according to Christie’s.
For Ms Nicole Sales Giles, Christie’s director of digital art, the auction’s results confirm that collectors recognise the influence and importance of the artists whose creations were featured.
Mr Steven Sacks, founder of New York’s Bitforms Gallery, which has been exhibiting digital art since 2001, said: “There could have been a better selection of works that are more representative of new media and AI. The bigger conversation is – should they be at auction yet?”
He felt more time was still needed to educate people about the medium and for artists to gain credibility and exposure.
A separate group of artists had launched a petition urging Christie’s to cancel the sale.
The 6,490 or so signatories argued that some pieces had been created with the help of AI models “known to have made unauthorised use of works protected by intellectual property law”.
For them, auctioning AI-created art lets money be made from “massive theft of works by human artists”.
In 2023, several artists sued generative AI start-ups, including popular platforms Midjourney and Stability AI, contending the software models were “trained” with human-made works to which they had no rights.
Christie’s and rival Sotheby’s have featured AI-created works at auctions in the past, but this was Christie’s first event devoted to works conceived with the new technology.
In 2018, an algorithm-generated painting by French collective Obvious fetched US$432,500, including fees and commissions, stunning the art world. And in 2022, an animated work by Anadol was acquired, also at Christie’s, for US$1.38 million. AFP
