US-China trade deal: Phase One commodity targets likely more than China can chew, say analysts

China has pledged to buy US$50 billion more in US energy supplies, and will raise US agriculture purchases by some US$32 billion over two years.
China has pledged to buy US$50 billion more in US energy supplies, and will raise US agriculture purchases by some US$32 billion over two years.PHOTO: AFP

BEIJING/SINGAPORE (REUTERS) - Commodity traders and analysts are struggling to map out how China will reach the eye-popping amounts it is committing to buy from the United States under Phase One of their trade deal.

China has pledged to buy US$50 billion more in US energy supplies, and will raise US agriculture purchases by some US$32 billion over two years above 2017's US$24 billion baseline, according to a source briefed on the deal to be signed on Wednesday (Jan 15). The deal also stipulates purchases of an additional US$80 billion in manufactured goods.

Those totals would certainly trim the roughly US$300 billion annual trade gap between the countries. However, analysts who study Chinese commodity flows remain sceptical that Beijing can absorb such quantities of US goods without threatening trade ties with other suppliers, hurting its own domestic producers, and making substantial changes to import standards and quotas.

"Either China massively increases imports and reduces current account surplus from the current 1.5 per cent of GDP (gross domestic product), or it engages in trade diversion away from current providers of goods which compete with the US," said Alicia Garcia Herrero, Chief Economist Asia Pacific at Natixis in Hong Kong.

"I see this second scenario as much more likely."

ENERGY

China will have to include US crude, liquefied natural gas (LNG) shipments and imports of petrochemical raw materials such as ethane and liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) to meet the target, Chinese trade sources and analysts said.

But it would still struggle unless new supply deals are signed that displace other exporters, they said.

The US$50 billion target is "too aggressive and unlikely to achieve", said Seng Yick Tee, an analyst at SIA Energy in Beijing, adding that energy product exports from the US to China were about US$8 billion in 2017 and 2018.

"To achieve US$25 billion a year, all the imports need to be tripled."

Gavin Thompson, vice chair for Asia Pacific at Wood Mackenzie, was surprised by the energy figure since it would mean tariffs on US crude and LNG imports would have to be removed, particularly for LNG to be competitive.

 
 
 
 

Quality, rather than quantity, may be another hurdle.

"Most of the Chinese refineries were designed to process medium-sour crude, but US oil is mostly light, sweet," SIA's Tee said, referring to the density and the sulphur amounts in crude, which dictate the types of fuels that can be refined from an oil.

AGRICULTURE TARGET 'SHOCKING'

The pledge to boost US farm imports by over US$30 billion over two years is "shocking" since that increment is more than the value of farm products it has purchased from the US in a single year, said a China-based grains trader. "It would make (more) sense if the US$32 billion is the total number, not the increased number."

Such a large fixed dollar-figure from one producer would also risk supply disruptions and distort international crop prices, said Iris Pang, Greater China economist at ING in Hong Kong.

"Prices of agri (commodities) from the rest of the world could be cheaper, especially after China cut import tariffs (in January). So even after retaliatory tariffs are removed, the US will not have a competitive advantage over other economies," she said.

Traders also questioned what products China could buy from the US since African swine fever has dented demand for soy beans for animal feed and quotas to protect domestic farmers limit grain imports.

"China will, for sure, buy more soy beans, let's say, 30 to 40 million tonnes. (For) wheat, maybe we can increase purchases within the import quota," said a trader with a Chinese grain importer.

A third grains trader said: "If such volume (of products) come to China, it will be a disaster for us (in the domestic market)."