Nvidia rebuts critics in memo to analysts amid pushback campaign

Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox

Nvidia also provided a detailed rebuttal, pointing to its publicly available disclosures, to say why it should not be compared to historical accounting frauds.

Nvidia also provided a detailed rebuttal, pointing to its publicly available disclosures, to say why it should not be compared to historical accounting frauds.

PHOTO: REUTERS

Follow topic:
  • Nvidia defends its US$4.5 trillion valuation against critics like Michael Burry via a memo to analysts rebutting claims of piling inventories and customer solvency issues.
  • Nvidia addresses concerns about its Blackwell chips having lower gross margins and higher warranty costs due to their complexity in the memo seen by Reuters.
  • Nvidia used social media to defend against claims Meta might use Google's AI chips, drawing criticism for publicly responding to a major customer.

AI generated

- Nvidia, the world’s most valuable company, has gone on the defensive against sceptics of its US$4.5 trillion (S$5.8 trillion) valuation, down from a historic US$5 trillion, by waging an information campaign on Wall Street and social media.

Last week, the company issued a detailed memo to sell-side stock analysts with a point-by-point rebuttal of claims made by Mr Michael Burry, who was featured in the book and movie The Big Short, and others writing on Substack.

Mr Burry, who shot to fame for betting against the US housing market ahead of the 2008 financial crisis, is widely watched by investors for his comments on markets and the economy; he has stepped up criticism of Nvidia in recent weeks in a new newsletter.

The memo, seen by Reuters, was published in full by research firm Bernstein on Nov 26. In it, Nvidia responded to a Substack essay by a different author that purported to use an artificial intelligence (AI) analysis of Nvidia’s public financial disclosures to show that inventories were piling up and customers were unable to pay.

Nvidia also provided a detailed rebuttal, pointing to its publicly available disclosures, to say why it should not be compared to historical accounting frauds such as WorldCom, Lucent or Enron. But Nvidia did concede that its most recent Blackwell chips had lower gross margins and higher warranty costs than previous models due to the Blackwell’s complexity.

Nvidia did not respond to a request for comment on the memo.

The memo was published by Bernstein a day after Nvidia’s shares declined following the release of a report from technology publication The Information saying Meta Platforms was in discussions with Alphabet’s Google to use Google AI chips that compete with Nvidia’s semiconductors.

Nvidia publicly responded to the story on X, saying it is “delighted by Google’s success” but that its chips remain “a generation ahead” of its rivals. The post itself drew questions and criticism from users on X who wondered why Nvidia was taking to social media to defend itself against Google, which is one of Nvidia’s major customers.

“Surely someone at Nvidia sees how bad this looks... right?” wrote researcher Susan Zhang from Google’s DeepMind, who has more than 38,000 followers. REUTERS

See more on