For subscribers

Whistle-blower ordered to pay $50k over false allegations

Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox

There are risks of seeing the rules protecting whistle-blowing as as a blank cheque to back-stab colleagues whom you dislike.

Informants will no longer be shielded if it is found that they had a motive to harm and bad-mouth their intended targets.

PHOTO: UNSPLASH

Follow topic:

SINGAPORE - Whistle-blowers serve a valuable function in throwing a spotlight on an organisation’s corrupt behaviour, but there is a fine line between legitimate disclosure and backstabbing, as one man here discovered to his considerable cost.

The employee blew the whistle on the executive director of his company, but instead of the pat on the back he was expecting, he was ordered by the High Court in 2022 to pay $50,000 compensation for defamation.

See more on