Vistara, AirAsia India resist govt pressure to ban comedian

Comedian Kunal Kamra (left), a known critic of the government, has been banned by four Indian airlines for accosting TV news anchor Arnab Goswami on an IndiGo flight on Jan 28. Mr Goswami’s polemical shows are a platform for launching a wave of inv
Comedian Kunal Kamra (left), a known critic of the government, has been banned by four Indian airlines for accosting TV news anchor Arnab Goswami on an IndiGo flight on Jan 28. Mr Goswami’s polemical shows are a platform for launching a wave of invective at government critics. PHOTOS: LAMC PRODUCTIONS, AGENCE FRANCE-PRESSE

Vistara, an Indian airline owned partially by Singapore Airlines, and AirAsia India have stuck to the rule book and not rushed in to ban an Indian comedian, defying a public advisory to do so on Twitter from Indian Civil Aviation Minister Hardeep Singh Puri.

Four major carriers – IndiGo, Air India, GoAir and SpiceJet – announced a ban on Kunal Kamra last month after he accosted Mr Arnab Goswami, a controversial but popular Indian television news anchor sympathetic to Bharatiya Janata Party, on an IndiGo flight on the afternoon of Jan 28.

Mr Goswami’s polemical shows are a prime-time platform for launching a wave invective at critics of the government.

Kamra, a known critic of the government, had posted a video the same afternoon on Twitter, where he is seen accosting Mr Goswami, asking him whether he is a “coward” or a “nationalist” as part of a nearly two-minute monologue.

Mr Goswami, who is the editorin- chief of Republic TV, did not respond and kept his gaze fixed on his laptop with his earphones plugged in. That same night, IndiGo tweeted that it had banned Kamra from taking its flights for six months for what it described as “unacceptable behaviour”.

The airline had tagged Mr Puri in its tweet. In less than an hour, Mr Puri had retweeted the post, saying: “Offensive behaviour designed to provoke and create disturbance inside an aircraft is absolutely unacceptable and endangers the safety of air travellers.

” He added: “We are left with no option but to advise other airlines to impose similar restrictions on the person concerned.”

Within 24 hours, the three other airlines announced they had banned Kamra too, tagging Mr Puri in their tweets.

This prompted criticism of the four airlines for kowtowing to the government and flouting established government procedures that determine who can be banned from flying and for how long.

Vistara and AirAsia India have not yet announced a similar ban on Kamra.

A statement issued to The Sunday Times by Vistara said the airline will “review and follow due process in such cases”.

AirAsia India did not respond to a request for comment.

According to government rules, a “Level One” offence includes any unruly physical gesture or verbal harassment – including unruly behaviour from drunk passengers – for which the person can be banned from flying for up to three months.

IndiGo, on the other hand, banned Kamra for six months within hours of the incident. A sixmonth ban is reserved for “Level Two” offences of physically abusive behaviour on board an aircraft, which Kamra did not engage in.

 

Moreover, any decision to impose a ban requires the commanding pilot to file a complaint.

The pilot of the IndiGo flight Kamra was on – Captain Rohit Mateti – did not do so and a public statement attributed to him said Kamra did not defy instructions from the crew at any point and that his actions did not qualify as a Level One offence.

The airline concerned also needs to constitute an internal committee to adjudicate on a complaint against a passenger accused of being unruly, and then arrive at a decision within 30 days of the complaint.

The passenger in question, meanwhile, is to be handed an interim ban of up to 30 days by the airline.

Other airlines may choose to deny service to the passenger only if the passenger is held guilty by the original airline’s inquiry but are not compelled to do so. The passenger banned also has the right to appeal.

“It is clear that the whole action is high-handed,” Mr D. Sudhakara Reddy, founder and national president of the Air Passengers Association of India, told The Sunday Times.

“It is a pity the passenger was not given an opportunity to be heard. They (the government and the four airlines) have not followed the rules laid down by themselves,” he said. The association had previously been part of internal committees set up by different airlines to adjudicate on complaints against passengers.

On Feb 2, Kamra flew on a Vistara flight from Mumbai to New Delhi and tweeted a picture of himself in front of the check-in counter.

“My airport look all thanks to @airvistara following due process... #lovevistara,” he said. Many others also posted messages online supporting the stand taken by AirAsia India and Vistara.

On Thursday, four individuals held up placards supporting Kamra on an IndiGo flight from Varanasi to Delhi. The placards, posted by one of them on Twitter, read: “We condemn IndiGo’s ban on Kunal Kamra #YouDivideWeMultiply.”

Kamra, meanwhile, has sent Indi- Go a legal notice, demanding a public apology, 2.5 million rupees (S$48,900) for “causing mental pain and agony” and a revocation of the six-month ban.

A version of this article appeared in the print edition of The Sunday Times on February 09, 2020, with the headline 'Vistara, AirAsia India resist govt pressure to ban comedian'. Print Edition | Subscribe