US could escort Philippine resupply missions in South China Sea, admiral says

Sign up now: Get insights on Asia's fast-moving developments

A Philippine coast guard ship on a resupply mission to a disputed shoal on Aug 26 is blocked by a much larger Chinese ship.

A Philippine coast guard ship on a resupply mission to a disputed shoal on Aug 26 is blocked by a much larger Chinese ship.

PHOTO: AFP

Google Preferred Source badge

MANILA – US ships could escort Philippine vessels on resupply missions in the South China Sea, a top admiral said on Aug 27, describing what he called an “an entirely reasonable option” that required consultation between the treaty allies, however.

The remarks, which are likely to annoy China, were made by Admiral Samuel Paparo, commander of the US Indo-Pacific Command, after

a series of maritime and air confrontations

between the Philippines and China in the South China Sea in the past week.

Beijing has pressed its claim to the disputed conduit for more than US$3 trillion (S$3.9 trillion) of annual ship-borne commerce, while Manila has kept up supply missions, particularly those to a beached naval ship on the hotly contested Second Thomas Shoal.

“Escort of one vessel to the other is an entirely reasonable option within our Mutual Defence Treaty,” Adm Paparo told reporters on the sidelines of a military forum organised by the Indo-Pacific Command.

He was responding to a query about whether Washington would consider providing escorts to ships from the Philippines taking supplies to disputed geographical features in the waterway.

“I mean certainly, within the context of consultations,” Adm Paparo added, without giving details of ships likely to be employed for the task.

General Romeo Brawner, the Philippine military chief, said the Philippines prefers to run those missions on its own, however, making every effort to ensure their success despite what Manila calls China’s

“dangerous” and “coercive” actions

.

“We are going to try all options, all avenues that are available to us,” Gen Brawner told reporters. “While we can do it by ourselves, we will do it.”

But the Philippines would seek alternatives if it found itself constrained from doing so, he added.

“It’s not just perhaps operating with the United States, but also with other like-minded nations.”

Washington is bound by a Mutual Defence Treaty dating from 1951 to defend the Philippines in case of armed attacks on its forces, public vessels or aircraft in the South China Sea.

That treaty must be interpreted more broadly to tackle a “dynamic and cunning adversary”, Philippine Defence Minister Gilberto Teodoro told reporters, although it has already proved a “great deterrent” in the South China Sea.

In recent years, the Philippines has complained of China’s use of so-called grey-zone tactics, or coercive actions that are just shy of armed conflict. But China has maintained its actions were professional and lawful.

Mr Teodoro also urged regional nations to call out China, which he described as the “biggest disruptor of peace”, for its activities in the waterway.

“I believe they’re not undeterrable, because it’s just a question of getting a worldwide consensus,” he said.

Creating sufficient deterrence militarily was critical for the Philippines to show China it was serious about protecting its sovereignty, and which it would fight for, he added.

China claims sovereignty over nearly all of the South China Sea, including areas claimed by Brunei, Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Taiwan and Vietnam. Beijing has deployed an armada of vessels to protect its claims.

In 2016, an international arbitration tribunal ruled that Beijing’s claim had no basis under international law in a landmark victory for the Philippines, which filed the case. Beijing rejects that decision. REUTERS

See more on