Doctors sharing patient information for sex: Disciplinary watchdog must do better

It has been 22 months since the Singapore Medical Council (SMC) received a complaint about a psychiatrist who shared information on his patients with a surgeon in order to groom them for sex - and no action has been taken. The SMC needs to improve its process of handling complaints, to protect patients better.

New: Gift this subscriber-only story to your friends and family

The court judgment earlier this month against Dr Julian Ong Kian Peng, who claimed he had been defamed, has raised some worrying facts - and points to the failure of the doctors' professional watchdog body, the Singapore Medical Council (SMC), to protect patients in a timely manner.

Dr Ong, a surgeon in private practice, had sued the woman for defaming him in her complaint to the SMC against Dr Chan Herng Nieng, a psychiatrist, who had been both her doctor and lover.

Already a subscriber? 

Read the full story and more at $9.90/month

Get exclusive reports and insights with more than 500 subscriber-only articles every month

Unlock these benefits

  • All subscriber-only content on ST app and straitstimes.com

  • Easy access any time via ST app on 1 mobile device

  • E-paper with 2-week archive so you won't miss out on content that matters to you

Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

A version of this article appeared in the print edition of The Straits Times on April 16, 2020, with the headline Doctors sharing patient information for sex: Disciplinary watchdog must do better. Subscribe