Changes to elected presidency seek to improve system, not bar certain individuals: Shanmugam

Minister for Home Affairs and Law K Shanmugam in a dialogue session on the topic of elected presidency on Sept 18, 2016.
Minister for Home Affairs and Law K Shanmugam in a dialogue session on the topic of elected presidency on Sept 18, 2016. ST PHOTO: NG SOR LUAN
Minister for Home Affairs and Law K Shanmugam in a dialogue session on the topic of elected presidency on Sept 18, 2016.
Minister for Home Affairs and Law K Shanmugam in a dialogue session on the topic of elected presidency on Sept 18, 2016. ST PHOTO: NG SOR LUAN

SINGAPORE - Changes to the elected presidency are aimed at improving the system for Singapore's long-term future, not at barring certain individuals from standing, Law Minister K Shanmugam said on Sunday (Sept 18).

"The starting point in looking at this is the system. We are doing this for the future, for the benefit of Singaporeans, our children and our grandchildren," he said at a dialogue with 1,300 grassroots leaders and residents from Central Singapore District at ITE College Central.

"You don't look at individuals, and then work backwards," he added.

The recommended changes, that the Government broadly accepted in a White Paper last Thursday (Sept 15), were also proposed by a constitutional commission who felt the eligibility criteria should be raised, as did many of the participants, the minister noted.

Mr Shanmugam, who is also Minister for Home Affairs, was replying to a question on whether the changes might appear aimed at denying candidates like Dr Tan Cheng Bock, who ran in the 2011 presidential election, a chance to contest the next election - which is due by August 2017.

On Saturday (Sept 17), Dr Tan wrote on Facebook that Mr Shanmugam had said at an earlier dialogue last Thursday that he could not qualify under the changes.

Said Dr Tan: "Is there some truth after all that the changes in the rules was to make sure I would not be eligible? It would be a sad day for Singaporeans if a constitutional change was made because of an individual."

Responding to the dialogue participant's question on Sunday, Mr Shanmugam said Singaporeans should "start with a set of logical questions on the system, and then apply it fairly".

The questions are:

 - Do you believe that Singapore needs a president with specific powers to say no to the Government?

 

- If so, do you think this person needs to be elected and cannot be appointed by the Government?

- If so, do you think there must be some criteria beyond being a Singaporean aged 45 and above, so he can say yes or no to spending a large sum from the reserves?

- And if so, do you think this criteria needs to be reviewed regularly?

Mr Shanmugam asked for a show of hands to each of these questions, and a majority of the participants raised their hands.

"Once you look at it like that, you will see that this is not directed at any individual," he said.

The Government was updating the system for the "best possible chance" of having the right person for the job, not making exceptions to ensure a particular individual would qualify or not qualify, he said.

 Mr Shanmugam noted it had been 25 years since the elected presidency was introduced, and a constitutional commission led by Chief Justice Sundaresh Menon had studied over 100 written submissions and invited 20 groups or persons who made them to public hearings, which were widely covered by the media, before putting out its recommendations.

These include private-sector candidates having been the most senior executive in a company with at least $500 million in shareholders' equity, compared to the current $100 million in paid-up capital.

There will also be a mechanism to reserve the next election for a candidate from one of the three main racial groups - Chinese, Malay, or Indian and others - if no one from that group has held the office in the preceding five terms .

 

Related Stories: 

Other questions raised on Sunday included whether the Council of Presidential Advisers should be elected and if there should still be a vote if only one candidate was eligible to stand for election that year.

Sculptor Elsie Yu asked if the Government would consider reserving elections for women too. Mr Shanmugam said it probably would not go down this route, "but we should try and change attitudes, particularly of our men".

 Participants were also divided on whether the provision to ensure minorities are represented in the presidency was necessary - even as some felt five terms was too long.

"There are many different views," Mr Shanmugam said, noting that GRCs to ensure minority MPs were initially unpopular but have become a mainstay of the political system.

"It shows you the importance of having it, because in some things the Government has got to take the lead," he added.