US lawmakers take baby steps towards election reform

The Presidential Election Reform Act aims to remove ambiguities in the wording of the 1887 Electoral Count Act. PHOTO: REUTERS

WASHINGTON - US lawmakers voted Wednesday in favour of narrow reforms to a loosely-worded 135-year-old law that former president Donald Trump tried to exploit to overturn his presidential election defeat.

The action comes less than 50 days before the US midterm elections that decide which party controls Congress, with a sharp rise in candidates who refuse to accept the 2020 results, sparking fears for the health of US democracy.

After losing to Democrat Joe Biden, the Trump campaign attempted to take advantage of ambiguities in the 1887 Electoral Count Act (ECA) in a failed bid to have then-vice president Mike Pence block certification of the election results.

The Presidential Election Reform Act tightens the wording of the ECA - which lays out how the state-by-state Electoral College results are tallied - on the vice-president's role and on how many lawmakers are required to object to a state's election results.

The controversy was at the heart of the 2021 US Capitol insurrection, and there is cross-party enthusiasm in both chambers of Congress to ensure there is no repeat of the violence that left scores of police with injuries and was linked to five deaths.

"This Bill will prevent Congress from illegally choosing the president itself," said Republican Liz Cheney, who co-authored the text and has a leading role in the congressional investigation into Mr Trump's actions before and during last year's violence.

The House Bill passed by 229-203, with eight other Republicans crossing the aisle.

But it looks unlikely to prevail in upcoming negotiations to merge the legislation with a narrower Senate version that appears already to have the Republican support required to get to Mr Biden's desk.

Neither effort is as comprehensive as the Freedom to Vote Act and John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act, which fell to a Republican blockade in the Senate.

Progressive Democrats see the latest drive as a poor substitute for those Bills, which took aim at restrictive voting laws being introduced in Republican-led states across the country. AFP

Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.