Trump administration moves to repeal Biden power plant pollution rules

Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox

The rules, if finalised, would mean no power plant would be able to emit more than it emits today or as much as it did a year or two ago.

The rules, if finalised, would mean no power plant would be able to emit more than it emits today or as much as it did a year or two ago.

PHOTO: AFP

Follow topic:

- US President Donald Trump’s administration has proposed repealing rules passed under former president Joe Biden to curb emissions of carbon dioxide, mercury and other air pollutants from power plants, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) administrator Lee Zeldin said on June 11.

The announcement, following through on a promise the EPA made in March, is a key step in Mr Trump’s broader efforts to unwind environmental regulations he views as unnecessary barriers to industrial development and expanded energy production.

“EPA is taking an important step, reclaiming sanity and sound policy, illustrating that we can both protect the environment and grow the economy,” Mr Zeldin said at EPA headquarters.

Electric utilities and miners cheered the move to eliminate the Biden-era rules, which Mr Zeldin said would save companies US$120 million (S$154.1 million) a year.

Environmental groups slammed the proposal, saying it would cost more than that in damage to the environment and public health.

In March, Mr Zeldin announced his intent to unwind three dozen existing agency air and water rules.

The June 11 announcement focuses on carbon emission and mercury regulations and launches the formal process to repeal those regulations.

The EPA has already exempted 47 companies from regulations to curb mercury and air toxics for coal-fired power plants for two years, according to a list of facilities published by the EPA in April.

That move was intended to prevent power plants from having to retire as the US faces an expected jump in electricity demand linked to a surge in data centre construction.

Mr Zeldin said data centres will consume 10 per cent of US electricity supply within 10 years, up from 3 per cent to 4 per cent currently, so more gas and coal power will be needed to “make America the AI capital of the world”.

Mr Biden’s carbon emission rules for power plants would have reduced greenhouse gas emissions by 1 billion tonnes by 2047, a crucial part of his administration’s fight against climate change.

The electricity sector is responsible for nearly a quarter of US greenhouse gas pollution.

Mr Zeldin said the rules, if finalised, would mean no power plant would be able to emit more than it emits today or as much as it did a year or two ago.

The proposal has two parts: the first would repeal the carbon pollution standards finalised in 2024 by the Biden EPA calling for carbon emission reductions from existing coal- and new gas-fired power plants.

The second, which Mr Zeldin said would save US$120 million a year, would repeal Mr Biden’s move to strengthen the 2012 mercury and air toxics rule, requiring continuous monitoring requirements.

American Lung Association president Harold Wimmer said the mercury limit rollback was “indefensible from a public health standpoint and a betrayal of EPA’s mission”.

Mr Shaun Goho, legal director at Clean Air Task Force, said: “These regressive proposals are bad for public health and bad for climate, all to prop up some of the highest polluting power plants in the nation.”

Evergreen Action senior power sector policy lead Charles Harper said: “Eliminating Biden-era power plant standards will erase US$240 billion in climate benefits and US$120 billion in public health savings.”

Mr Alex Bond, director of legal policy at the Edison Electric Institute (EEI(, said: “Regulatory flexibility and certainty are critical for electric companies as they work to meet the nation’s growing demands for reliable electricity, while also keeping customer bills as low as possible.”

EEI said it still supports the EPA’s authority to regulate greenhouse gas emissions under the federal Clean Air Act.

National Mining Association president Rich Nolan said nullifying the EPA’s two most consequential air rules removes “deliberately unattainable standards and levelling the playing field for reliable power sources, instead of stacking the deck against them”.

US Reresentative Rob Bresnahan, a Pennsylvania Republican whose district will have nine new data centre projects in coming years, said repealing the power plant rules will enable more gas plants to come online to help power surging electricity demand.

“The simple fact is we need more power on the grid to power all of this,” he said. REUTERS

See more on