Sperm count drop prompts warning of human extinction

This file photo taken on Nov 30, 2000, shows human eggs being prepared for fertilisation at the French national centre for the study and conservation of human sperm (CECOS) in Rennes.
This file photo taken on Nov 30, 2000, shows human eggs being prepared for fertilisation at the French national centre for the study and conservation of human sperm (CECOS) in Rennes.PHOTO: AFP

WASHINGTON - The quality of sperm from men in North America, Europe and Australia has declined dramatically over the past 40 years, with a 52.4 per cent drop in sperm concentration, according to a study published on July 25.

The research is the largest and takes the most comprehensive look at the topic, involving data from 185 studies and 42,000 men around the world between 1973 and 2011. The study appears to confirm fears that male reproductive health may be declining, reported Washington Post.

Lead researcher Dr Hagai Levine, an epidemiologist, told the BBC that if the trend continued humans would become extinct.

"If we will not change the ways that we are living and the environment and the chemicals that we are exposed to, I am very worried about what will happen in the future," he said.

"Eventually we may have a problem, and with reproduction in general, and it may be the extinction of the human species."

Scientists not involved in the study have praised the quality of the research but say that it may be premature to come to such a conclusion, according to BBC News.

The state of male fertility has been one of the most hotly debated subjects in medical science in recent years.

While a number of previous studies found that sperm counts and quality have been falling, some dismissed or criticised the studies over factors such as the age of the men included, the size of the study, bias in counting systems or other aspects of the methodologies.

Some of the other concerns are outlined in an analysis published by the American Society of Andrology, which focuses on the male reproductive system.

The scepticism also has to do with the difficulty of comparing records from a fertility centre in the 1970s with one from today and with the fact a single man's sperm count may fluctuate during his life span due to his weight, use of alcohol and many other factors.

However, Professor Shanna Swan, one of the authors of the new study published in the Human Reproduction Update, said that the new meta-analysis is so broad and comprehensive, involving all the relevant research published in English, that she hoped it would put some of the uncertainty to rest.

Then, the scientific community could move forward into putting its resources into figuring out the why of what is going on, she said.

"It shows the decline is strong and that the decline is continuing," Prof Swan said in an interview with Washington Post.

The analysis found drops only for men in Europe, North America and Australia and not for those in South America, Asia and Africa.

Prof Swan explained that this could mean that there is something specific to certain cultures or regions that affects sperm, but that it is also possible that there just is not enough data yet to draw firm conclusions about the rest of the world.

There have been far fewer sperm studies conducted in non-Western countries, according to the Washington Post report.

Some of the most recent ones have also noted a decline in aspects of sperm quality. A study published earlier this year about China's Hunan province found that only 18 per cent of sperm donations met the criteria for health in 2015, compared with 56 per cent in 2001.

The most important data points in the new study involved sperm concentrations for what are known as "unselected" men who have not yet proven they are fertile.

These are men in the studies who are on the younger side and are not yet fathers or do not have partners who are pregnant. Researchers estimated that these men had an average sperm concentration of 99 million per millilitre in 1973 but that that had dropped to an average 47 million per millilitre in 2011.

That is a disturbing number given that, according to World Health Organisation criteria, men with a sperm concentration of less than 40 million are considered to have an impaired chance of conceiving and those with a sperm concentration of less than 15 million per millilitre are unlikely to be able to have children.

These numbers mean "surprisingly higher proportions of men are falling into the infertile and sub fertile categories", Prof Swan said.

There are numerous theories about what may be happening to sperm.

Many scientists say the most sensitive period may be during the first trimester, when the developing fetus' reproductive system may be impacted by a mother smoking, stress she experienced or food she ate. Exposure to chemicals that can change hormone levels, known as endocrine disruptors, are among the issues being studied.

Over the life span, men are also exposed to a number of other things that could potentially influence sperm concentration: pesticides, lead, X-rays, stress and countless other factors.

The changes in the womb can cause permanent damage, Prof Swan explained, while the adult exposures are mostly reversible.

The issue of sperm is not just about having babies. It has larger implications for men's health. Poor sperm health has been linked to cardiovascular issues, obesity, cancer and more generally to higher rates of hospitalisation and death.

While men's life expectancy is increasing overall, thanks to advances in medical care, nutrition and sanitation, it is not unthinkable that that could one day reverse.

"Having a low sperm count is a signal that there's something wrong in men's health overall," said Prof Swan.