Start-ups are betting on AI to predict the future

Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox

The most advanced models can also formulate their own questions about the future.

The most advanced models can also formulate their own questions about the future.

PHOTO: REUTERS

  • Startups are using AI to make future forecasts on markets, politics and culture, and some models now match or beat top human “superforecasters”.
  • AI prediction tools have won competitions and helped users make big gains, while firms say they are already affecting trading and may soon dominate prediction markets.
  • The technology is spreading into government, business, science and insurance, but experts warn that wider access could raise risks if countries like Russia or China build better systems.

AI generated

NEW YORK – Several start-ups are betting that they can leverage artificial intelligence to make better forecasts than even the most specialised experts when it comes to topics as varied as stock market movements, the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz or how a Shakira song will perform on music charts.

By 2030, “we’re going to feel that what we were doing for our decision-making was complete Stone Age thinking”, Dan Schwarz, co-founder of the forecasting company FutureSearch, said.

AI forecasting models are already on a par with the best “superforecasters” – gifted individuals whose estimates are markedly superior to those of ordinary people – thanks to troves of data acquired from both public and private sources.

In early September, two AI models made history when they took the top spots in the Metaculus Cup, a competition among prediction champions, both human and non-human.

FutureSearch’s in-house human wizard, superforecaster Tom Liptay, is aware that “he’s not secure in his job” in the medium term, Schwarz said.

“He knows that these things are going to surpass him.”

Theo Summer, who co-founded Preseen with Veniamin Veselovsky, used AI tools to turn US$35 (S$44.80) into US$1.9 million in just seven months on the American prediction-making site Kalshi.

The idea is not to guarantee a result but to define a probability of occurrence, with the ability to cross-check assumptions related to several interconnected events – for example, changes in the price of oil and the war in the Middle East.

“Right now, the quickest buyers are normally the hedge funds, just because if they think they can make money off something, they can move pretty fast,” Veselovsky said.

Algorithms have shaped Wall Street for more than a decade, but the rise of AI forecasting is likely to further increase the automation of financial markets.

“It’s probably already having a small impact because we already have customers who use it when making trading decisions,” said Toby Shevlane, the co-founder of another forecasting start-up called Mantic.

Now-famous prediction markets Kalshi and Polymarket, which are used by millions of Americans, are also becoming inundated by AI use.

It might soon be too late for retail investors, who do not have access to expensive AI tools, to profit on those types of consumer-oriented trading sites because “they will soon just be dominated by AI forecasting systems”, Veselovsky said.

Risk management

The most advanced models no longer just predict events, either.

They can also formulate their own questions about the future and then assign probabilities based on the different possible outcomes, Shevlane said.

Their sphere of influence is beginning to extend beyond finance, as well, with potential applications in government policy, corporate decision-making, scientific research, and insurance risk assessments.

Mantic provides a large American company with likely scenarios of regulatory developments in its sector and has also worked for the British government.

Companies “are interested in risks and how to monitor them”, Shevlane said.

Meanwhile, other customers might be more interested in medical research, particularly to help make decisions around which types of treatments would be best to fund, Schwarz said.

Widespread access to these types of tools can come with costs, though.

“I think that good can be derived from this,” Veselovsky said, but “I’m also a little bit scared because, you know, maybe Russia or China has better systems.” AFP

See more on