Execution drugs spark controversy as supplies dwindle

WASHINGTON (AFP) - The United States is turning to new drugs for lethal injections as supplies of the current standard dwindle, sparking lawsuits from death row prisoners that the changes will cause undue suffering.

Two men were put to death on Wednesday in Texas and Arizona, using a lethal dose of an animal anaesthetic customised by a compounding pharmacy - which has not been approved at the federal level.

The two convicts tried to press the issue in court - in one case, all the way to the Supreme Court - arguing the untested drug risked subjecting them to "cruel and unusual punishment," forbidden under the Constitution.

The issue has been building at least since 2011, when the United States stopped producing the drug used since the introduction of lethal injections in the 1980s.

Now, states that allow the death penalty find themselves "at a dead end," said Deborah Denno, a US expert on lethal injection.

Pentobarbital, a drug used to euthanise animals, was adopted to replace the previous cocktail - but states are finding themselves without a supplier, yet again.

The Danish producer of the drug refused to provide it to the United States for the purpose of executing humans, and a Washington court has forbidden states to purchase drugs unregulated in the US from foreign laboratories.

As a result, nearly all of the eight states that have carried out executions this year - including Ohio, Missouri, Texas, Georgia, Florida and Arizona - "are making changes in their lethal injection process," said Richard Dieter, director of the Death Penalty Information Centre.

Missouri has started using propofol, the anaesthetic that killed Michael Jackson - but once again, the state found itself unable to replenish its stocks when the German manufacturer refused to sell it for human executions.

Another option that has emerged are compounding pharmacies, which can customize drugs for its clients.

But when a judge ordered Texas to reveal its new supplier for pentobarbital, the compounding pharmacy found it did not want to be drawn into the legal battle over executions.

Compounding pharmacies, which are regulated at the state, but not federal, level, had already sparked a scandal in November 2012, when one such company was deemed responsible for a deadly meningitis outbreak because of poor hygiene.

And inmates are arguing they cannot be trusted to safely produce drugs used for executions.

Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.