Families of victims demand criminal prosecutions after Grenfell Tower fire inquiry

LONDON – Mr Hisam Choucair lost his mother, sister, brother-in-law and three young nieces when a devastating fire engulfed Grenfell Tower, a 23-storey social housing block in west London, in 2017. 

“Words cannot describe the pain I have gone through,” the 46-year-old said as he held back tears at a news conference on Sept 4 to mark the release of the final report by a public inquiry into the tragedy that killed 72 people. 

The inquiry panel blamed the disaster on failings by the government, construction industry and, most of all, the firms involved in fitting the tower’s exterior with flammable cladding.

Mr Choucair thanked the inquiry for its findings and recommendations, but said the probe had delayed the justice his family deserved as it did not allow for criminal proceedings to begin.

A public inquiry seeks to establish facts, but it is not a criminal court. The Crown Prosecution Service said it did not expect to make any charging decisions until the end of 2026, meaning trials might take place only a decade after the blaze.

Mr Choucair said the inquiry not only delayed justice, but also was distressing to watch.

“I have seen witnesses laugh while giving evidence, knowing they are partially to blame for what happened on the horrific day,” he said. 

Mr Karim Khalloufi, from Morocco, whose sister Khadija died in the fire, said the inquiry “robbed” him and other family members and survivors of justice, but the time for it had now come.

“The minimum we are asking is criminal prosecution for manslaughter,” Mr Khalloufi said, promising to fight on.

Living in fear

Mr Khalloufi said the group he is part of, the Grenfell Next of Kin, which organised the news conference, would meet the government and the other authorities, including police and prosecutors, to ensure justice was served. 

Prime Minister Keir Starmer said the release on Sept 4 of the final report was a “long awaited day of truth, but it must now lead to a day of justice”. 

Some are not hopeful. Mr Shah Aghlani, who lost his mother and aunt in the fire, said he was pessimistic about criminal prosecution and added that he expected “smaller charges” that might lead only to fines and not jail time.

If there is no adequate criminal prosecution, unsafe cladding such as that used at the Grenfell Tower will continue to be an issue in Britain and around the world, Mr Aghlani argued. 

“There are no consequences,” he said. “Seven years on and people are living with this cladding, they are living in fear.”

As at July, 4,630 buildings standing at 11m or higher still had unsafe cladding, with remediation work yet to start on half of them, British government data showed.

Ms Maryam Adam, a survivor of the fire, said she wanted everyone to remember that the 72 who died were “people who lived and had dreams”.

She said: “I just want justice for them.” REUTERS