BRUSSELS • European leaders descended on Brussels yesterday to launch the hunt for a new generation of top EU officials in the wake of elections that shook up traditional alliances.
The key job to be filled is that of president of the European Commission, the union’s powerful chief executive, a five-year post now held by Mr Jean-Claude Juncker.
Under EU treaty law, the European Council of 28 national leaders nominates a commission president, then the new 751-member Parliament ratifies their choice.
But the procedure, while seemingly straightforward, masks a power struggle between rival states and ideological blocs and between the leaders and Parliament itself.
Mr Juncker’s deputy and the centre-left challenger for the top job, former Dutch minister Frans Timmermans, compares the ruthless intrigue to Game Of Thrones.
And the game kicked off yesterday, when European Council president Donald Tusk hosted the EU leaders for a summit dinner in Brussels to lay out the ground rules.
Many in Brussels argue that the European project is best served by a “political commission” headed by a president with a mandate from the trans-national Parliament. But most of the leaders think the union’s legitimacy derives from its member states and that the council should pick one of their own, someone with leadership experience.
Many in Brussels argue that the European project is best served by a “political commission” headed by a president with a mandate from the trans-national parliament. But most of the leaders think the union’s legitimacy derives from its member states and that the council should be able to pick one of their own.
The results of the EU elections did not strengthen Parliament’s hand – except perhaps for the boost of the larger than expected voter turnout.
While a threatened surge of eurosceptic and far-right populist parties was contained, the pro-Europe centre was fragmented, with liberals and Greens gaining ground.
In previous years, a coalition of the Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D), and the conservative European People’s Party (EPP) was able to wield a majority. Now it cannot govern without the liberal Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe (ALDE) or the Greens. And this complicates their choice of a “spitzenkandidat” – or lead candidate.
On paper, eight of the 28 EU leaders hail from EPP parties, but Hungarian Premier Viktor Orban’s Fidesz is suspended and Austrian Chancellor Sebastian Kurz was sacked on Monday.
Mr Timmermans will have the S&D’s backing and ALDE, while dubious about the process, could back Ms Margrethe Vestager.
The Danish competition commissioner might win the backing of French President Emmanuel Macron, while Germany’s Chancellor Angela Merkel backs Bavarian conservative Manfred Weber.
But, according to one senior European official, if it comes down to a Franco-German clash the leaders might choose to avoid a crisis and back a Timmermans compromise.
The big three groups are united in opposition to the far-right eurosceptics, but there are signs the Greens, ALDE and the S&D might prefer a progressive candidate over the EPP.
Ms Vestager is a younger choice, has a certain profile as the woman who took on the US Internet giants as a regulator, and would be the first female president.
But she is from Denmark – a non-core member which opted out of the euro and the Schengen passport-free zone – and would probably not have her home government’s backing.
She might have Mr Macron’s support, but the French leader’s decision to invest himself personally in the campaign only to come in second to Ms Marine Le Pen’s far-right party has weakened him.
Enter Mr Timmermans. “Everyone recognises his intellectual brio. He has fought for the rule of law with passion,” the senior official said, suggesting the ground is shifting.