Brazil President Bolsonaro's son faces probe over 'ghost employees'
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox

The Rio de Janeiro Prosecutors' Office said they were investigating Mr Flavio Bolsonaro over suspicion he embezzled public money by hiring "ghost employees".
PHOTO: AFP
RIO DE JANEIRO (AFP) - Brazilian prosecutors have started a new investigation into the eldest son of President Jair Bolsonaro over suspicion he embezzled public money by hiring "ghost employees", officials said.
The Rio de Janeiro Prosecutors' Office said in a statement on Saturday (Nov 23) that they were investigating Mr Flavio Bolsonaro - a 38-year-old senator - in relation to "the employment of ghost employees" from his Cabinet.
The events in question date to the period he was regional deputy of the state of Rio.
Mr Flavio Bolsonaro's father, the far-right president Jair Bolsonaro, took office on a promise of eradicating corruption, but has been repeatedly hit by scandals involving his son.
At the beginning of the year, another investigation initially focused on the younger Bolsonaro's former bodyguard and driver, a policeman named Fabricio Queiroz.
Brazil's government anti-financial crimes agency COAF detected 1.2 million reais (S$390,000) in transactions made in 2016 through Mr Queiroz's accounts, far exceeding his salary.
One transaction was a deposit to an account belonging to President Bolsonaro's wife Michelle.
The President said it was repayment of an undeclared loan he had made to Mr Queiroz.
Later, it was revealed that COAF also found 48 deposits to Mr Flavio Bolsonaro's account in June and July 2017 - some made within minutes of each other - that totalled 96,000 reais.
Both Mr Queiroz and Mr Flavio Bolsonaro denied wrongdoing in media interviews.
The prosecutor's office opened an investigation into the case, but it was suspended in July after the Supreme Court decided judicial authorisation was needed to obtain this type of financial data.
The decision could soon be reversed, however, after the court last week began a fresh debate in plenary session, the result of which could exempt prosecutors from requiring such authorisation.

