Gianni Infantino says he is open to talks over FIFA reform

PARIS – FIFA president Gianni Infantino has proposed an independent review of the world football body’s decision-making, in a move that could help him regain support after the withdrawal of a controversial private investment plan.

“First, I will ask the council whether it wishes to commission an independent external review of FIFA’s current governance framework for major strategic initiatives and recommend potential improvements,” Infantino wrote to the FIFA Council and all 211 member association presidents in a letter seen by Reuters.

He also said he would propose consultations with confederations, member associations and other stakeholders on strengthening FIFA’s decision-making.

The proposals would examine who has a say in major initiatives, including the respective roles of the president, bureau, council and congress, and how to improve transparency and accountability.

On Sept 22, Germany’s Football Association president Bernd Neuendorf responded by saying that the letter was a mere ploy by Infantino to get re-elected in 2027.

“I regard Gianni Infantino’s letter as a transparent ploy to secure his re-election next year.

“Fundamentally, FIFA now seems to have recognised that changes are essential. However, Gianni Infantino is definitely not the right person to lead a reform process.

“He has squandered all credibility,” said Neuendorf, who is also a member of the FIFA Council, the organisation’s main decision-making body.

Infantino faced fierce backlash over his proposal to sell a 20 per cent stake in FIFA’s commercial rights, including the World Cup, to private investors.

The plan was abandoned in July after opposition and boycott threats, with UEFA, the Asian Football Confederation and CONCACAF subsequently calling for changes to FIFA’s leadership.

His opponents have been struggling to find a candidate to challenge Infantino, who will be running for re-election in March in Rabat. Sources familiar with the discussions told Reuters in September that he still had enough votes to win, prompting opponents to focus on curbing his powers.

The 56-year-old said the abandoned plan had explored whether selling a minority stake in a FIFA-controlled commercial company could raise more money for football development. It would not have involved giving up control over sporting decisions, he said.

But the proposal became public before it could be presented in full to the council and member associations, according to Infantino.

“I recognise that, without the full context, this caused concern and created the impression that decisions had already been taken. They had not,” said Infantino.

“It remained a proposal, not a decision, and was always subject to the necessary approvals of the council and the member associations. It has now been withdrawn and will not proceed.”

Infantino said he had heard differing ideas about who should decide major strategic questions.

Some favoured requiring unanimous agreement in the bureau, while others wanted such matters put directly to congress and the member associations.

“My role is not to pre-judge that discussion. Those who support a particular model should have the opportunity to set out their case clearly,” he wrote.

Suggestions received by the Oct 15 council meeting could be discussed there, with later submissions also considered within a deadline yet to be specified. Any changes to FIFA’s statutes would need approval by the congress.

Infantino also said member associations’ positions on proposals or governance matters would not affect their treatment by FIFA, whose development and solidarity programmes would continue under existing rules.

“No association’s treatment will depend on its position on any proposal or institutional matter,” he wrote.

“I remain fully committed to leading FIFA and confident in what we can achieve together.” REUTERS