Jail, fine for those caught holding a phone while driving on S’pore roads under proposed law
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox
On July 7, MHA tabled the Road Traffic (Miscellaneous Amendments) Bill.
PHOTO: ST FILE
- The new Bill proposes penalties for holding a mobile phone while driving, even when the driver is not using it, to improve road safety.
- The Bill also introduces a new offence for purposeful endangerment causing death or grievous hurt, with harsher penalties including up to 15 years' jail, caning and lifetime driving bans.
- Penalties for dangerous and careless driving causing grievous hurt are increased, and an automated system will be used to issue traffic violation notices to improve enforcement efficiency.
AI generated
SINGAPORE – After a new law is passed, those caught holding a smartphone while driving could get into trouble even if they were not using the phone.
That is because Singapore’s roads have become more dangerous, and the tightening of laws is in response to its roads becoming less safe, said the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA).
On July 7, MHA tabled the Road Traffic (Miscellaneous Amendments) Bill.
The proposed legislation also introduces new offences for purposeful endangerment and driving under the influence of drugs.
Between 2021 and 2025, traffic deaths increased by about 24 per cent, while traffic violations rose by about 38 per cent.
Traffic deaths hit a 10-year high of 149 in 2025, compared with 141 in 2016. There were 142 deaths in 2024. The number of people injured on the roads also rose, from 9,342 in 2024 to 9,955 in 2025.
MHA said: “To arrest this trend, we will be tightening enforcement and penalties for traffic offences.”
Laws now already make it an offence to text or call while holding a phone and driving. Those caught are usually handed 12 demerit points and a $400 to $500 fine.
In more serious cases, however, they can be prosecuted in court.
If convicted, first-time offenders can be jailed for up to six months and fined $1,000. Repeat offenders can be jailed for up to a year and fined $2,000.
Such cases require proof that the device was being used, making the laws difficult to enforce. To catch offenders, the authorities have to see the offence taking place and verify that an offender was using a phone.
The Bill removes the need for this. Instead, just holding the phone while the vehicle is moving will be an offence, as it is dangerous and makes it less likely that the driver would be focused on the road, said MHA.
This will allow the Traffic Police (TP) to catch offenders by using cameras, or photos and videos sent in by the public.
The Bill, however, will not affect the use of mounted devices, and drivers can still hold their devices when the vehicle is stationary.
Another issue is how vehicles can become dangerous weapons when drivers use them to deliberately hurt others.
MHA said: “Where a driver deliberately endangers another person using a vehicle and causes death, he must face consequences that are proportionate to his culpability and harm.”
Such drivers cannot be convicted of murder or culpable homicide, unless it can be proven beyond reasonable doubt that they intended to kill or knew that the act they carried out was likely to cause death.
At present, a first-time offender is likely to be charged instead with dangerous driving causing death and faces a maximum of eight years’ jail.
In the case of Jarrett Tee Lee Kiat, who showed no remorse after causing the death of an 18-year-old during an expressway race, he was sentenced to five years and eight months’ jail after pleading guilty to dangerous driving.
MHA said there should be graver consequences for such conduct.
To address this, the Bill introduces a new offence: purposeful endangerment using a vehicle, causing death or grievous hurt.
Offenders can be jailed for up to 15 years, fined, caned and disqualified from driving for life, or for at least 10 years if there are special reasons.
The Bill also increases penalties for dangerous and careless driving that causes grievous hurt.
On Dec 5, 2025, Yoong Kok Kai had his jail term increased from 3½ years to five years for causing an accident, while drunk, that left an auxiliary police officer in a vegetative state.
Yoong began driving home after three consecutive drinking sessions, ended up at Tuas Checkpoint and lost control of his vehicle.
The High Court judge who imposed the higher sentence had said there was no excuse for those who choose to drink large amounts of alcohol, yet drive. The judge had wondered if the maximum sentences were fully adequate for the worst types of incidents, but said it was a matter for the legislature.
For dangerous driving causing grievous hurt, the Bill will see the maximum jail time raised from five to seven years for first-time offenders, and from 10 to 13 years for repeat offenders.
There are no proposed changes to the maximum jail terms for careless driving causing grievous hurt.
For both offences, additional penalties due to aggravating factors will be raised.
Serious offenders, such as those who commit offences while drink-driving, will face up to 18 months’ additional jail time, up from one year now.
Serious repeat offenders will face additional jail time of up to three years and six months, compared with the additional maximum of two years now.
The Bill also makes clear that where a disqualification order is made against an offender who is jailed, the disqualification period starts only after release from prison, even if the jail term is for an unrelated offence.
MHA said hundreds of thousands of traffic violations are processed by TP annually. Most are detected by cameras, and officers are legally required to review every photo or video.
The Bill will allow them to use an automated decision-making system and automatically issue notices to vehicle owners.
MHA said the system will be used only to process technical violations that can be verified from the evidence, such as speeding and red-light violations.
Vehicle owners who receive the notices will continue to be required to provide the identity and address of the driver who had committed the offence within 14 days.
MHA said the owners may apply for the notices to be revoked if the vehicle or the offence was wrongly identified by the system, and TP will manually review such appeals.

