Budget Debate 2018

Robust debates in the House: How far is too far?

Parliamentary privilege allows MPs to speak without fear of being sued. But when does this cross into abuse of power?

WP chairman Sylvia Lim (left) had voiced her suspicion that the Government had intended to raise the GST immediately but that it backtracked after negative public reaction. While later saying her suspicion "may have been wrong", she refused to withdraw her comment and apologise for it. Leader of the House Grace Fu said Ms Lim's conduct fell short of the standard of integrity and honour expected of members. PHOTOS: GOV.SG/YOUTUBE
New: Gift this subscriber-only story to your friends and family

The Budget debate may be over, but one aspect still sticks in people's minds: the exchanges between Workers' Party (WP) leaders and several People's Action Party (PAP) ministers.

During the Budget round-up debate on March 1, WP chairman Sylvia Lim voiced her suspicion that the Government had intended to raise the goods and services tax (GST) immediately but that it backtracked after negative public reaction. While later acknowledging that her suspicion "may have been wrong", Ms Lim refused to withdraw her comment and apologise for it.

Already a subscriber? 

Read the full story and more at $9.90/month

Get exclusive reports and insights with more than 500 subscriber-only articles every month

Unlock these benefits

  • All subscriber-only content on ST app and straitstimes.com

  • Easy access any time via ST app on 1 mobile device

  • E-paper with 2-week archive so you won't miss out on content that matters to you

Join ST's WhatsApp Channel and get the latest news and must-reads.

A version of this article appeared in the print edition of The Sunday Times on March 11, 2018, with the headline Robust debates in the House: How far is too far?. Subscribe