Parliament: Critical thinking not just in liberal education, but all schools here, says Faishal

SINGAPORE - Critical thinking is an essential skill that Singapore wants its young people to learn, and it is not confined to just liberal arts education, said Senior Parliamentary Secretary for Education Faishal Ibrahim in Parliament on Monday (Oct 7).

"All of our educational institutions nurture students to conduct critical thinking, with maturity of thought and a sense of responsibility towards society," he added.

He was replying to Nominated MP Walter Theseira, who had called on the Government to extend liberal education beyond institutions like Yale-NUS College, a liberal arts institution.

Dr Faishal said universities have core curriculum components that develop critical thinking skills. "We will work with the Autonomous Universities (AUs) to see how this can be further enhanced but the AUs have their constraints like limited curriculum time."

Critical thinking skills are also taught in subjects like social studies at the secondary and pre-university levels, he added.

Dr Faishal also touched on the importance of academic freedom in the context of Singapore's norms, a topic Education Minister Ong Ye Kung had dwelt on at length earlier in the House.

Mr Ong explained it when addressing MPs' questions on the recent cancellation of a Yale-NUS module on dissent and resistance.

Dr Faishal, who is also Senior Parliamentary Secretary for Social and Family Development, said academics should not be overly concerned about academic freedom and urged them to exercise sensible judgment.

"Even in the most liberal societies, academic freedom needs to exist within the norms and culture of the community," he pointed out.

He cited the example of an American university which in 2013 withdrew a forum invitation to Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, then chief minister of India's Gujarat state, because of an online protest against him.

"Our universities, being based in Singapore, must operate within Singapore's laws and recognise our particular social and cultural context, like everyone else," he added.

Dr Faishal said he agreed with Prof Theseira's point that the role of the academic while in the classroom should not be one of an activist.

Prof Theseira had said: "This is not because activism is wrong, but it is because the students should be tested on their ability to discern the truth, and not on whether their values align with that of the instructor."

Similarly, Dr Faishal said: "Academics can hold their own views on various issues, but they should not mobilise support for partisan causes in the course of teaching and mentoring students."

Ms Sim Ann, Senior Minister of State for Culture, Community and Youth, replied to Nominated MP Anthea Ong, who took up the remaining time allotted for the adjournment motion and spoke on youth activism.

Ms Ong had called on the Government's SG Youth Action Plan (SG YAP) to involve youth in policy-making, saying young people should be able to choose their representatives for the panel.

Ms Sim assured the House the Government is committed to supporting youths who want to help shape the country's future, noting that the SG YAP is part of the Government's effort to work with citizens.

"The SG YAP seeks to support youths in coming up with robust and impactful policy ideas and projects, by equipping them with the information and resources they need," she said, pointing out that youth leaders get to engage directly with ministries on policy issues like sustainability.