Why prosperity has increased but happiness has not

New: Gift this subscriber-only story to your friends and family

In 1990, Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher of Britain was challenged in Parliament by a Labour Member of Parliament on the subject of growing inequality. "All levels of income are better off than they were in 1979," she retorted. "The honourable Member is saying that he would rather that the poor were poorer, provided the rich were less rich... What a policy!"

That slap-down was an iconic formulation of a premise of the Thatcher-Reagan conservative revolution: Poverty is a social problem, but inequality, as such, is not. Governments should aim to increase the incomes and opportunities of all, especially the poor, but to worry about the gap between the rich and the rest is "the politics of envy".

Already a subscriber? 

Read the full story and more at $9.90/month

Get exclusive reports and insights with more than 500 subscriber-only articles every month

Unlock these benefits

  • All subscriber-only content on ST app and straitstimes.com

  • Easy access any time via ST app on 1 mobile device

  • E-paper with 2-week archive so you won't miss out on content that matters to you

Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

A version of this article appeared in the print edition of The Straits Times on August 23, 2018, with the headline Why prosperity has increased but happiness has not. Subscribe