Competition law

Why dominant and small players are treated differently

Having issued a provisional infringement decision against Grab for violating Singapore's competition law prohibition against mergers that substantially lessen competition, the Competition and Consumer Commission of Singapore (CCCS) has proposed a number of striking behavioural remedies to help restore the competition that was eliminated when Uber ceased its local operations and "merged" with Grab.

In March, news broke that ride-hailing company Grab acquired its US-based competitor's Singapore and South-east Asian operations for an undisclosed sum.


Thank you for reading The Straits Times

You have reached one of our Premium stories. To continue reading, get access now or log in if you are a subscriber.

What is Premium?

A version of this article appeared in the print edition of The Straits Times on August 07, 2018, with the headline 'Why dominant and small players are treated differently'. Print Edition | Subscribe