Why a health policy banning e-cigarettes is an act of prudence

On June 9, two academics argued in these pages that a ban on e-cigarettes is not good policy. Here, another health expert offers a different view.

Fierce ongoing debate between sceptics and enthusiasts on the benefits and ills of e-cigarettes demonstrates how contentious the topic of e-cigarettes can be.

Professor Tikki Pang and Ms Gayle Amul recently weighed in on the range of policy responses to e-cigarettes globally, and concluded that Singapore ought to keep an open mind on e-cigarettes and shape policies only on the back of evidence and evaluations about costs and benefits (Why a ban on e-cigarettes may not be the best policy; June 9).

Please or to continue reading the full article.

Get unlimited access to all stories at $0.99/month

  • Latest headlines and exclusive stories
  • In-depth analyses and award-winning multimedia content
  • Get access to all with our no-contract promotional package at only $0.99/month for the first 3 months*

*Terms and conditions apply.

A version of this article appeared in the print edition of The Straits Times on June 16, 2018, with the headline 'Why a health policy banning e-cigarettes is an act of prudence'. Print Edition | Subscribe