What it would mean to end the Korean war

North and South Korea were pawns in their own war. Let them be the main actors in finally making peace.

New: Gift this subscriber-only story to your friends and family

WASHINGTON • No, the Korean War still is not over. While an armistice in 1953 ended active fighting, it was never followed by a peace treaty. This is why during their recent meeting, North Korean leader Kim Jong Un and South Korean President Moon Jae In, in addition to jointly calling for the "complete denuclearisation" of the Korean peninsula, also pledged to formally conclude the war.

Much ambiguity remains about what exactly it would take to accomplish what Mr Kim and Mr Moon vowed to do, and many analysts have expressed scepticism about this diplomatic overture, pointing to a number of other supposed breakthroughs in the past that petered out. Yet this moment does seem different in at least one important respect.

Already a subscriber? 

Read the full story and more at $9.90/month

Get exclusive reports and insights with more than 500 subscriber-only articles every month

Unlock these benefits

  • All subscriber-only content on ST app and straitstimes.com

  • Easy access any time via ST app on 1 mobile device

  • E-paper with 2-week archive so you won't miss out on content that matters to you

Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

A version of this article appeared in the print edition of The Straits Times on May 15, 2018, with the headline What it would mean to end the Korean war. Subscribe