What Court of Appeal's judgment on Pofma may mean for Fica

The parties to which Pofma and Fica are targeted at occupy the same cyberspace, but it is necessary to be mindful of the nuances in assessing the constitutionality of each statute

Last Friday, a five-judge Singapore Court of Appeal, in a landmark decision, considered the scope and application of the Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act (Pofma) and upheld its constitutionality.

Since Pofma's enactment in October 2019, there has been considerable public interest in the ambit of Pofma because online falsehoods have the potential to affect everyone in Singapore. Correction Directions issued by the relevant Minister, which are the primary tools to counteract the communication of online falsehoods, have also been in the media limelight.

Please or to continue reading the full article.

Get unlimited access to all stories at $0.99/month
  • Latest headlines and exclusive stories
  • In-depth analyses and award-winning multimedia content
  • Get access to all with our no-contract promotional package at only $0.99/month for the first 3 months*

*Terms and conditions apply.

A version of this article appeared in the print edition of The Straits Times on October 15, 2021, with the headline 'What Court of Appeal's judgment on Pofma may mean for Fica'. Subscribe