US President Donald Trump's possible meeting with Mr Kim Jong Un to discuss North Korean nuclear weapons is considered a fairly unpredictable event. It's worth a look at how an economist might use game theory to think about such a summit, if only to explain why there is more room for things to go wrong than to get better.
Game theorists often approach a problem by first considering where a series of strategies might end up, and then working backwards to understand current choices. When it comes to North Korea, the theorist would start with a scenario in which it is just a few years from having intercontinental missiles able to target major US cities. That is good for their leadership and very bad for others, including a South Korea that would end up more vulnerable to a North Korean invasion.
TO READ THE FULL ARTICLE
Thank you for reading The Straits Times
You have reached one of our Premium stories. To continue reading, get access now or log in if you are a subscriber.
What is Premium?