Three niggling questions about CareShield Life

Can it be gender-neutral? Where did the prediction of severe disability for those above 65 come from? And can criteria for payouts be more lenient?

The proposed CareShield Life scheme has generated much debate both inside and outside Parliament. Its broad thrust - to provide an inclusive national insurance scheme for the long-term care of our ageing population - is very welcome. But the devil is in the details.

There are three points that cry out for clarification, further discussion and reconsideration - gender-differentiated premiums, the projection that one in two Singaporeans could be severely disabled in old age, and the definition of "severely disabled".


Thank you for reading The Straits Times

You have reached one of our Premium stories. To continue reading, get access now or log in if you are a subscriber.

What is Premium?

A version of this article appeared in the print edition of The Straits Times on July 19, 2018, with the headline 'Three niggling questions about CareShield Life'. Print Edition | Subscribe