The proposed CareShield Life scheme has generated much debate both inside and outside Parliament. Its broad thrust - to provide an inclusive national insurance scheme for the long-term care of our ageing population - is very welcome. But the devil is in the details.
There are three points that cry out for clarification, further discussion and reconsideration - gender-differentiated premiums, the projection that one in two Singaporeans could be severely disabled in old age, and the definition of "severely disabled".
We have been experiencing some problems with subscriber log-ins and apologise for the inconvenience caused. Until we resolve the issues, subscribers need not log in to access ST Digital articles. But a log-in is still required for our PDFs.