Forget the false dichotomy between a process that is doctor-centric and one that is patient-centric. A good consent-taking process requires patients to participate and doctors to respond to their concerns.
Wong Chiang Yin For The Straits Times
Dec 14, 2019, 5:00 am SGT
New: Gift this subscriber-only story to your friends and family
In March, the Ministry of Health appointed a workgroup to review the taking of informed consent and the Singapore Medical Council (SMC) disciplinary process. The group's report was published on Dec 3. I am honoured to be a member of this workgroup. After nine months of many intense meetings and discussions, the "baby" has finally been delivered in the form of the report.
As the long name of this workgroup suggests, work was focused on two areas: informed consent and the SMC disciplinary process. The workgroup made 29 recommendations, of which only three were specifically in the area of informed consent. This small number of recommendations may suggest that much of the workgroup's efforts were directed at other areas, such as the SMC disciplinary process and continuing medical education. This was hardly the case, as much of the feedback and robust discussions between the workgroup and other parties as well as within the workgroup itself were devoted to informed consent.
We have been experiencing some problems with subscriber log-ins and apologise for the inconvenience caused. Until we resolve the issues, subscribers need not log in to access ST Digital articles. But a log-in is still required for our PDFs.